Aside from the fact that no war is good
I take it you'll be signing up to fight then?
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 11:47, Reply)
I take it you'll be signing up to fight then?
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 11:47, Reply)
I suspect we wouldn't be given a choice.
I reckon the country going to war would be hugely beneficial from a societal standpoint. We've absolutely fucked it since the last one.
We'd lose a few folk, but that's probably for the best too. Puts things in perspective and all that.
Plus, it'd be quite exciting.
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 13:56, Reply)
I reckon the country going to war would be hugely beneficial from a societal standpoint. We've absolutely fucked it since the last one.
We'd lose a few folk, but that's probably for the best too. Puts things in perspective and all that.
Plus, it'd be quite exciting.
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 13:56, Reply)
I managed about 1:30 of this charmless fashy weirdo's rant.
Then I looked him up on wikipedia to see if his opinions are as worthless as they appear, and boy oh boy that was interesting.
The wiki talk page, that is, not the article about himself that he wrote himself. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mark_Felton
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 16:06, Reply)
Then I looked him up on wikipedia to see if his opinions are as worthless as they appear, and boy oh boy that was interesting.
The wiki talk page, that is, not the article about himself that he wrote himself. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mark_Felton
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 16:06, Reply)
Reference loops, where he quotes himself, from his own videos.
Isn't that one definition of disappearing up his own arse?
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 19:21, Reply)
Isn't that one definition of disappearing up his own arse?
( , Sat 23 Nov 2024, 19:21, Reply)
A synopsis?
If you would? I don’t have time to rummage through mountains of hyperbole.
( , Tue 10 Dec 2024, 19:38, Reply)
If you would? I don’t have time to rummage through mountains of hyperbole.
( , Tue 10 Dec 2024, 19:38, Reply)
Ok, so that's the how. What's missing is the why.
Why would Russia launch such an attack? Why would that not invoke NATO article 5 and thereby cause a devastating response?
( , Sun 24 Nov 2024, 9:46, Reply)
With nations like the US and China adopting a Launch-on-Warning response
And Russia's Perimeter System still fully operational (depending on who you ask), I suspect the apocalypse will end up being completely unintentional. It's only a matter or time before an Able Archer or Norwegian Rocket Incident ends in catastrophe.
I mean, the incoming US Secretary of Defense believes the earth was created 10,000 years ago and that dinosaur fossils are the result of the animals that didn't make it onto the ark in time.
That fuckwit might not have any direct control over the USA's nuclear arsenal, but I can't imagine that we're in significantly better hands with the people who do.
( , Sun 24 Nov 2024, 20:26, Reply)
And Russia's Perimeter System still fully operational (depending on who you ask), I suspect the apocalypse will end up being completely unintentional. It's only a matter or time before an Able Archer or Norwegian Rocket Incident ends in catastrophe.
I mean, the incoming US Secretary of Defense believes the earth was created 10,000 years ago and that dinosaur fossils are the result of the animals that didn't make it onto the ark in time.
That fuckwit might not have any direct control over the USA's nuclear arsenal, but I can't imagine that we're in significantly better hands with the people who do.
( , Sun 24 Nov 2024, 20:26, Reply)
Not disagreeing with that, but it doesn't explain why Russia would choose to launch a massive conventional attack against just the UK. Our best defence against such an attack isn't missile systems or early warning radar, it's article 5.
( , Mon 25 Nov 2024, 10:26, Reply)