It could eat anything. FUCKING YES.
(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 18:45, Reply)
Sort of expect the sea animals to be relativly uneffected by what killed off the land ones?
(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 19:01, Reply)
I used to have some Prehistoric Monsters top trumps and the top trump was Trilobite.
That one is long gone, but things like the Coelocanth still turn up news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/05/070522-coelacanth.html so who knows.
(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 19:15, Reply)
For example if the old meteorite-extinction theory is held to be true then you would expect the sun to be blotted out for a significant peroid of time. This would kill off the photosynthetic bacteria that live in the sea. The things that feed on those bacteria (krill, coral etc) then die off, the things that feed off those then die (fish, squid, seahorses etc), the things that feed off them die (pleisosaurs, posideon, the little mermaid) etc, basically ecosystems collaspe left right and centre so massive leviathons like this fearsome fucker then die off, and good fucking riddance.
(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 19:17, Reply)
But why do we still have sharks etc? I DEMAND ANSWERS!
I gues it was just too big for its own good?
(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 20:42, Reply)
but still ace. Wonder why something like that would be in the Arctic
(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 19:11, Reply)
Y'know, they find fossils, mix them up (either in transit or because they were mixed up in the ground), and put 2+2 together and get a fucking swimming T-Rex?

(, Mon 16 Mar 2009, 20:19, Reply)
"Using a wind tunnel, they reconstructed the forces that the creature's huge flippers generated and found that it probably cruised the oceans using its front two flippers only, deploying all four to lunge forwards and take its prey by surprise."
Because, of course, anything swimming near THAT fucker isn't surprised until it lunges forwards...
(, Tue 17 Mar 2009, 0:41, Reply)