
I didn't get that impression from this particular video, and it's the first I've heard of him, so...
I agree with most of what he says above, and I even go to church.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 18:39, Reply)

But I used to be a subscriber to his and eventually you just notice a clear pattern in his videos of intolerance toward religion and multiculturalism that could only come from a very bitter, UKIP voting ex-liberal.
And then you sort of realise his audience is probably predominantly made up of American teenagers who look and sound like The Amazing Atheist.
Perhaps I'm one of his 'left-wing pricks' in that sense I don't know.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 18:46, Reply)

all the anti-religious polemic that's all over the internet and in the media, real frothing at the mouth stuff. The Catholic church haven't burnt a heretic at the stake for centuries, now secular institutions perpetuate oppression, erode civil liberties, fight wars for oil and completely screw the economy over, and at whom do the Western world's self-defined skeptics vent their frustrations? Some folks who like to dress up in fancy robes and dole out crisps once a week.
It's a smokescreen.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 18:55, Reply)

you hit the nail on the head there.
It's people and persons that fuck the world up, not religions.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:00, Reply)

something to label as "evil" or "the enemy", and it's not going to be liberal democracy, or free market capitalism, or whatever else we hold dear. Pick an easy target and lay into it.
Some people are already proposing (however ironically) the solution to "the religious problem". All sounds too familiar...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:06, Reply)

Wow, I think you've just solved EVERY single argument EVER.
Or just said something a bit dumb.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:20, Reply)

Are you one of those annoying people who tries to make themselves look the smartest on the internet?
You are aren't you.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:29, Reply)

I did say what you said was dumb, not you.
...and then apologised.
But yes, I am one of those people who get their rocks off looking clever on puerile digital arts communities. I am currently eating a croissant. And wanking.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:34, Reply)

All good. No hard feelings.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:36, Reply)

I guess I just get irked by religious apologists in the same way you get annoyed with militant athiests. I guess I'm always going to go for the latter, if it's ever necessary to choose.
Mind, he is an overly-aggressive self-serving smug. Sometimes he hits the nail on the head, however.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:30, Reply)

There are plenty of aspects of religion that should make people angry - teaching kids unscientific stuff in science lessons, anti-gay propoganda etc.
However, treating all religious people as if they are the same and discounting all positive aspects of religion is irrational and dumb.
You are right when you say there are bigger problems, but to re-word your argument "secular institutions perpetuate oppression, erode civil liberties, fight wars for oil and completely screw the economy over, and at whom do the Western world's church leaders vent their frustrations? Gays"
The church does itself no favours by who they have for spokesmen.
Though, to be fair, in many cases (such as this video) neither do atheists.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 19:53, Reply)

although really, and I've been meaning to say this since our last conversation, church leaders in this country at least tend to be on the whole a good deal more liberal than their congregations, but they're scared of alienating their conservative membership base. It's the laity we really need to worry about, homophobia isn't imposed top-down by the Archbishop of Canterbury on an otherwise tolerant population. Sad but true, so it appears to me. Not sure what to do about it.
Main article: Moral theology of Rowan Williams
Williams' contributions to Anglican views of homosexuality were perceived as quite liberal before he became the Archbishop of Canterbury. These views are evident in a paper written by Williams called 'The Body’s Grace',[33] which he originally delivered as the 10th Michael Harding Memorial Address in 1989 to the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement, and which is now part of a series of essays collected in the book Theology and Sexuality (ed. Eugene Rogers, Blackwells 2002).
The conservative churches in the United States, however, are currently going mental over this. They can't even criticise capitalism as an outlet, unlike our lot, so they've got to invent a "gay agenda" instead...
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 20:03, Reply)

to Conservatives and actually preach the mostly-liberal message Jesus had.
If the Christian church has any purpose, surely it is to preach Jesus' words rather than to try and get the numbers up by saying what the audience want to hear.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 20:20, Reply)

but it's politics, isn't it. It's not that easy to do and keep your job, I guess, ultimately it's the laity who pay their wages. It must be like trying to steer a container ship.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 20:26, Reply)