
He's not doing anything wrong/illegal. This country bitterly complains about the gutter press here, but really, most people are no better. I'm appalled by this to be honest.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 10:47, Reply)

yeah you're right.
no public interest in a former political mover who used to work for Tony Blair having a VIP account on an underage porn site.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 10:51, Reply)

why should there be? the police should be interested, but why the public?
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 10:53, Reply)

there's a difference between public interest & interesting to the public.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 11:29, Reply)

Is it definitely a paedo site? Has he engaged in noncey behaviour? Has anything be proved? No. But already his career's shafted.
As I said, everyone pours acorn on the tabloids, but getting your rocks off on this schadenfreude is no better.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 11:01, Reply)

and if that's all there was then I would agree with you. Can't say I agree/disagree with outing paedos...don't really see what good it does. if it's just done out of malice, why publish? why not just give it to the police?
kind of see what you are saying, I think.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 10:52, Reply)

Someone meeting others for sex though, yes that's nobody's business but consenting adults. Maybe Albert Marshmallow wrote the article.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 10:53, Reply)

There is a lot of vagueness around whether he actually looked at child porn, more insinuation then anything.
( , Sat 8 Dec 2012, 10:57, Reply)