You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 285785 | Random

This is a link post Angel Delight fireball
ooohhh.....ahhhhh....

I want to try this but I appreciate having hair and eyebrows.
(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 17:46, Reply)
This is a normal post much like why flour mills used to explode i suppose

(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 17:56, Reply)
This is a normal post Poor science teaching there
I use icing sugar, and blow it through Bunsen tubing attached to the end of a funnel which is under 2 Bunsens clamped sideways on 2 stands pointing inwards over the funnel. Much more fun. And you can find different powders to do it with all based around the same sugary concept. There are ways of getting a tin with icing sugar in to blow the lid off too. Sprinkling it onto candles just isn't as good when you know some of the better alternatives :P
(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 18:16, Reply)
This is a normal post do you have a picture of that setup?
i'm struggling...
(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 18:41, Reply)
This is a normal post We've done this for the Naked Scientists
Only more spectacularly and more safely - blowing custard power upwards through a blowtorch flame, gets a nice big fireball with the added bonus of you being below, rather than above, the offending inferno...

www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/kitchen-science/exp/rates-of-burning/

Plus, the instrument Dave has built with which to do this is known as the "custard crack pipe", due to it resembling, um, a crack pipe...
(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 19:21, Reply)
This is a normal post a simple experiement
now write a 1000 word report and why that happened.
(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 20:37, Reply)
This is a normal post Birds custard powder works a treat as well.

(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 22:50, Reply)
This is a normal post I always thought it was something to do with particle distance rather than the content
It also works with sawdust, flour and, the one I used to experiment with, coffee whitener. The Mythbusters did one on a massive scale with coffee whitener.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRw4ZRqmxOc
(, Tue 3 Mar 2009, 23:56, Reply)