(, Sun 12 Sep 2021, 19:55, Reply)
Obviously millions of books are pulped or burned ever year, but racist ones are especially precious.
(, Sun 12 Sep 2021, 20:18, Reply)
...it is usually on the pretext that the contents are dangerous.
The way to ensure that ideas, thoughts, opinions aren’t destroyed by those who want to silence them isn’t to say “we’ll only burn bad books”, it’s by saying “burning books is never a thing to be celebrated”
Critique a racist book. Analyse it, annotate it, say something insightful about its content. It’s bizarre that people don’t grasp this
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 8:05, Reply)
Eliminating history or texts usually occurs when you want to replace it with a new narrative that suits your cause. It's never for good reasons.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 11:51, Reply)
- like they do for old films with dodgier content than we'd comfortably tolerate these days?
On a related note, isn't it curious that we have widespread state film censorship, but it's far less common to see literary censorship.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 19:14, Reply)
I suspect that the vast majority of folk denouncing her for her 'racist' and 'ableist' overtones likely had no intention of reading her book in the first place.
People make a hobby of finding things to get morally outraged by these days. Instead of bowing to their demands of inoffensive vaguery, why not grow a fucking backbone and tell them to shit off, instead?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 22:51, Reply)
It's not like she was legally obliged to make cuts or anything.
(, Tue 14 Sep 2021, 6:56, Reply)
this is how it starts, people
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 0:14, Reply)
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 2:40, Reply)
comparing native Americans and insane anti-child abuse arsonists(!) to Nazis because FEAR THE LEFT.
Ignore the actual Nazis storming the US capital, murdering anti-Nazi protesters, and murdering pro-EU MPs, Canadians are burning racist schoolbooks! They'll be coming for our Golliwogs next!
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 16:05, Reply)
to be able to criticise burning of any books. The objection to book burning isn’t simply “nazis did this, therefore anyone doing it is a nazi”; the point is that burning books is an authoritarian act whereby a person or group decides for everyone else what ideas they are not allowed to be exposed to. The purpose is to rid the world of the content contained within. So if it succeeded in ridding the world of the content within, if I said “what did those books actually say?”, I’d by definition have to take it on trust as to what was actually said, deferring to those who didn’t want me to know what was actually said, rather than working out for myself whether it was abhorrent.
(, Tue 14 Sep 2021, 9:56, Reply)
wouldnt have been a fuss if they'd just binned them, just some tone-deaf attempt to win some virtue signalling brownie points. Or are brownie points racist? And without irony the "pc gone mad" sites are the first to get outraged by the trangressive symbolism
(, Tue 14 Sep 2021, 12:39, Reply)