Anything For Money
How low have you sunk to earn a few quid? Have you ever been paid a tenner by a stranger in the street to crap in a jar? Me neither. Tell us about the depraved or humiliating lengths you've gone to in order to raise cash.
( , Thu 10 Jul 2014, 15:35)
How low have you sunk to earn a few quid? Have you ever been paid a tenner by a stranger in the street to crap in a jar? Me neither. Tell us about the depraved or humiliating lengths you've gone to in order to raise cash.
( , Thu 10 Jul 2014, 15:35)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
well, no he isn't
people can choose what they want to accept, but they can't force someone else to accept it. it has to be mutual.
it's too boring to go into, unless you work in compliance and it's exciting compared to your actual job.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:26, closed)
people can choose what they want to accept, but they can't force someone else to accept it. it has to be mutual.
it's too boring to go into, unless you work in compliance and it's exciting compared to your actual job.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:26, closed)
I don't think there's a prize for the dullest thread of the year, soz
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:53, closed)
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 13:53, closed)
it'd be like watching an elderly chimp wanking with a tootsie roll
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 16:55, closed)
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 16:55, closed)
...which is the point.
'Legal tender' only has a very slim meaning and has zero bearing on what can be accepted as payment for goods or services.
So, while you are correct about small denominations not being legal tender for sums over afew pounds, it's entirely incorrect to say that it's a basis for refusal.
To reiterate, if legal tender meant the basis for acceptance of payment then you couldn't shop online. So your post was both boring and incorrect.
Welcome to Ringoland.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 16:12, closed)
'Legal tender' only has a very slim meaning and has zero bearing on what can be accepted as payment for goods or services.
So, while you are correct about small denominations not being legal tender for sums over afew pounds, it's entirely incorrect to say that it's a basis for refusal.
To reiterate, if legal tender meant the basis for acceptance of payment then you couldn't shop online. So your post was both boring and incorrect.
Welcome to Ringoland.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 16:12, closed)
If 'swipe's wrong, someone needs to tell the Only Connect team.
They based a question in the final on exactly this info. And we all know Victoria speaks only truth... and filth.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:29, closed)
They based a question in the final on exactly this info. And we all know Victoria speaks only truth... and filth.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:29, closed)
she is very wrong in thinking that legal tender status has any bearing on acceptability for payment in general transactions
Fo sho me nigga.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:37, closed)
Fo sho me nigga.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:37, closed)
but the post only refers to coins
it was meant to be a tiny bit of info about paying with coins. not a lecture on bartering with animals and oral sex. my god, you could suck the life out of an s-club party.
not that you'd ever be invited to a party. because, you know. shit and dull.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:49, closed)
it was meant to be a tiny bit of info about paying with coins. not a lecture on bartering with animals and oral sex. my god, you could suck the life out of an s-club party.
not that you'd ever be invited to a party. because, you know. shit and dull.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:49, closed)
...but legal tender status has no bearing on whether or not a vendor will accept coins
For a solicitor you have extremely poor deduction and reasoning skills.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:54, closed)
For a solicitor you have extremely poor deduction and reasoning skills.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 18:54, closed)
wow, plummie, I may have missed a trick or two
but wtf did swipe do to wind you up so much? You seem 'absurdly antagonised'*
*upset on the internet etc
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 19:24, closed)
but wtf did swipe do to wind you up so much? You seem 'absurdly antagonised'*
*upset on the internet etc
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 19:24, closed)
Ah, so you are qualified to judge legals as well as literature and academia?
No wonder you're the only person wherever you go that knows anything about anything, eh?
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 21:15, closed)
No wonder you're the only person wherever you go that knows anything about anything, eh?
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 21:15, closed)
you outlined the legal meaning of 'legal tender', yet you are still insisting it applies to situations outside of that definition.
You are, by your own admittance, wrong here.
Yet still you bash away.
It's a bit silly really.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 21:35, closed)
You are, by your own admittance, wrong here.
Yet still you bash away.
It's a bit silly really.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 21:35, closed)
But I never intended to define it
You are taking a silly point on semantics. Because you are a deathly dull tedious gimp.
Go and sit on your moribund cat and put it out of its misery.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 22:00, closed)
You are taking a silly point on semantics. Because you are a deathly dull tedious gimp.
Go and sit on your moribund cat and put it out of its misery.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2014, 22:00, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread