Attention whore
Because it's all me, me, me... Apart from posting awful lies on Question of the Week, what ridiculous things have you or others done to grab the limelight?
Suggested by Munsta
( , Thu 14 Nov 2013, 13:29)
Because it's all me, me, me... Apart from posting awful lies on Question of the Week, what ridiculous things have you or others done to grab the limelight?
Suggested by Munsta
( , Thu 14 Nov 2013, 13:29)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
me either. I assume it means the verminous subhuman scum that posted it were already on my blocklist.
Shame this site cant do something about getting rid of the more obviously inhuman posters and protecting the tattered remnant of its reputation as a host of jolly banter
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 12:12, 9 replies)
So who is the arbiter of who should be allowed to stay and who should be permabanned?
Because, you know, that's up to the mods and seeing as they aren't banning anybody (except for Bob Hairdome here, who had to come back with a new account) then it shows that either they don't give a shit about what you and the rest of the bleating fannies think, or they're happy enough to have a balanced forum that doesn't need to resort to the Stalinist tactics you're proposing.
Just putting that thought out there.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 12:20, closed)
Because, you know, that's up to the mods and seeing as they aren't banning anybody (except for Bob Hairdome here, who had to come back with a new account) then it shows that either they don't give a shit about what you and the rest of the bleating fannies think, or they're happy enough to have a balanced forum that doesn't need to resort to the Stalinist tactics you're proposing.
Just putting that thought out there.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 12:20, closed)
Posting on multiple accounts is a permabannable offence, you know.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 21:40, closed)
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 21:40, closed)
Member for a year. Never posted a single picture. Already got regulars on ignore. Thinks his opinion has some weight.
Exactly the sort of humourless, pompous prick that has ruined this place.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 13:28, closed)
Exactly the sort of humourless, pompous prick that has ruined this place.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 13:28, closed)
Funny thing about that. You put me on Ignore, not the other way around. Ah well, carry on...
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 16:24, closed)
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 16:24, closed)
I've got all the pompous shitcunts on ignore.
It's just a shame the shitcunt mods haven't fixed it yet.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 18:08, closed)
It's just a shame the shitcunt mods haven't fixed it yet.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 18:08, closed)
If the majority of people around you are shitcunts
just maybe it's not them that's the problem...
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 20:14, closed)
just maybe it's not them that's the problem...
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 20:14, closed)
None of the people around me are shitcunts.
Are you struggling in your EFL lessons?
( , Sun 17 Nov 2013, 9:52, closed)
Are you struggling in your EFL lessons?
( , Sun 17 Nov 2013, 9:52, closed)
haha, that's ace
now say something about "moral purity", "dissidents" and "racial degenerates"
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 14:40, closed)
now say something about "moral purity", "dissidents" and "racial degenerates"
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 14:40, closed)
"verminous subhuman scum" here being used to mean "people who have a different sense of humour to me"
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 15:02, closed)
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 15:02, closed)
Taking the internet FAR too seriously, here.
Go and have a wank, you humourless fuck.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 16:52, closed)
Go and have a wank, you humourless fuck.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 16:52, closed)
actually, since you're the one with the attitude problem,
why shouldn't the mods ban you instead?
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 17:27, closed)
why shouldn't the mods ban you instead?
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 17:27, closed)
The ability is there,
but I doubt if anything will happen no matter how much you want it to.
The site guidelines are as follows;
Do:
Have fun and join in with the conversations
Post pictures you have made
Post links to your new web projects
Say nice things about the pictures you like.
Don't:
Post stuff that is, or looks like porn - (see NSFW section)
Post pictures from sites that are not your own
Repost your old pictures in a new thread - that's what the 'View Older Messages' link is for.
Spam your website over and over again.
Be nasty or offensive to other boarders
Be boring
But the only thing that I think attracts the banhammer appears to be spammers. You can be as boring or offensive as you like (and as being offensive is also frequently boring, it's two for the price of one).
Having said all that - remember that you are under no compulsion to be here.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 17:53, closed)
but I doubt if anything will happen no matter how much you want it to.
The site guidelines are as follows;
Do:
Have fun and join in with the conversations
Post pictures you have made
Post links to your new web projects
Say nice things about the pictures you like.
Don't:
Post stuff that is, or looks like porn - (see NSFW section)
Post pictures from sites that are not your own
Repost your old pictures in a new thread - that's what the 'View Older Messages' link is for.
Spam your website over and over again.
Be nasty or offensive to other boarders
Be boring
But the only thing that I think attracts the banhammer appears to be spammers. You can be as boring or offensive as you like (and as being offensive is also frequently boring, it's two for the price of one).
Having said all that - remember that you are under no compulsion to be here.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 17:53, closed)
You forgot
It's best not to use your real names on any messageboard, and posting other people's real names when they'd rather they weren't known is a big no-no, and the same applies to any kind of private details.
Interestingly as I've found out, I can't post silly pics on here to annoy some of the shitflingers BUT many of them can repeatedly break the above rule.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 21:32, closed)
It's best not to use your real names on any messageboard, and posting other people's real names when they'd rather they weren't known is a big no-no, and the same applies to any kind of private details.
Interestingly as I've found out, I can't post silly pics on here to annoy some of the shitflingers BUT many of them can repeatedly break the above rule.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 21:32, closed)
Yeah, it's the 'when they'd rather they weren't known' bit, combined with you making a lifelong effort to associate the word 'ringofyre' with the name Rob Fairholme that makes your argument void.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 21:39, closed)
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 21:39, closed)
Wait, how can you see this if you have me on ignore, and have been told specifically by the mods to stop replying to the people you have on ignore?
Why should the rules not apply to you?
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:08, closed)
Why should the rules not apply to you?
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:08, closed)
I dunno why he bothers with 2.0
He thinks we care that he logs in and out like a spastic.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:16, closed)
He thinks we care that he logs in and out like a spastic.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:16, closed)
I'm still not really au fait with the whole "trolling"
thing.
Is this the right time to post this -
?
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:23, closed)
thing.
Is this the right time to post this -
?
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:23, closed)
Depends whether you're crying.
Oh who am I kidding, of course you are.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:33, closed)
Oh who am I kidding, of course you are.
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 22:33, closed)
who do you think you're kidding, you're the most persistent troll on here
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 23:03, closed)
( , Sat 16 Nov 2013, 23:03, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread