1) You suggest that the driver, might not be at fault. Under what circumstance would the driver not be at fault? It seemed cut and dry. Even if the cyclist was a decoy for the thief, did the driver know this?

2) How can I be putting words in your mouth when you suggested yourself that he was possibly a decoy for the thief.

3) Both sides of the story? Why do we need to hear both sides when it's impossible to actually know why the driver was being racist.....Prehaps it was because he was a racist.

5) What does playing the race card have to do with what we are talking about here, in what scenario did the cyclist play the race card??

6)Species and race, learn the difference.

Sorry I couldn't let this go unanswered, I found your posts a bit bizzare. I have a feeling i'm wasting my time though.
(bROKEN aRROW PUA HVI Master, Mon 20 Dec 2010, 13:08, 1 reply)

I'm pretty sure
My dog is smarter than you. You are almost incoherent.
(M61A1 CUPID- STUNTS, Tue 21 Dec 2010, 1:01, closed)