
I once was in a programming class where the task was "build a calculator". A student did one with buttons 1, 2, 3 all the way up to about 25 and then ran out of space on the screen. We've asked this before but liked it so much we're asking again: What's the best example of ignorance you've encountered?
( , Thu 30 Aug 2012, 12:30)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm afraid Richard Dawkins does come off as an arrogant dick. Unfortunate, but there you are. Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry were far better public figures for this, should atheism ever require such.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 10:11, 3 replies)

I find the same with politicians - "Vote for this party, because that party's rubbish!" piss off I'm perfectly capable of making up my own mind, thank you.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 10:13, closed)

Hint: pontiff.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 13:54, closed)

I think I remember reading that he was going to build a temple for you lot.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 10:33, closed)

is to provide a steeple from which he can be thrown.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 10:54, closed)

( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 21:18, closed)

There's as much evidence for the existence of Richard Dawkins as there is for the existence of God.
Lots of people claim to have seen both, but I've never seen either. Therefore, neither of them exist.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 11:55, closed)

Richard Dawkins is a human, you've seen lots of humans, and are aware that many more of them than you've met exist. God is a supernatural being, you've never met one, and have no reason to believe they exist other than hearsay.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 12:12, closed)

but then I'm from vanuatu, and I'm one of those people that worship prince philip
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 12:32, closed)

who are you to tell him what is or isn't real?
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 12:43, closed)

You say he's real and he's a human, but you are a believer. I could pop down to the church down the road and find someone who reckons that God is real and right there in the room with us. It doesn't prove anything.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 13:08, closed)

I'm afraid I'm going to have to file this under "Bloody daft". The closest concept I can think of for this is the "My universe is my eyes and my ears. Anything else is hearsay" concept from H2G2, or the self-aware universe bollocks courtesy of Alan Wilson Watts. Sorry, that's just daft.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 13:45, closed)

you can pretty much deny everything. Quite likely to end you up in an institution, though.
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 14:13, closed)

If you believe that God does not exist because you have no objective experience of him, then logically you must believe that Richard Dawkins doesn't exist if you have no objective experience of him.
Lots of people claim to have seen Richard Dawkins, and even spoken to him - but lots of people claim that about God, too. Some claim that they both exist, based on their objective experience of them.
Can you prove that God exists? Can you prove that Richard Dawkins exists?
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 16:04, closed)

Who claims actually to have seen god? What does he look like? Did they take pictures?
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 13:55, closed)

Does He have a sexy nurse looking after him?
( , Tue 4 Sep 2012, 15:33, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread