Bugs and feature requests
Found a problem on B3ta? Want other features that we don't currently offer? Type your ideas here with your finger-mouths. (We don't promise we'll act on any of it, but we will read it and your words could even prompt us into action.)
( , Wed 1 Nov 2006, 11:48)
Found a problem on B3ta? Want other features that we don't currently offer? Type your ideas here with your finger-mouths. (We don't promise we'll act on any of it, but we will read it and your words could even prompt us into action.)
( , Wed 1 Nov 2006, 11:48)
« Go Back
Some sort of backwards clique
so that new people are allowed to post pretty much instantly, but that people who are likely to post "OMG FAIL" or "You'd better look out because everyone is about to flame you" (unless the new people just aren't getting the point) don't actually see them.
That way newbies would only be seen by nice supportive people for the first week/month/whatever and the only real way for people to join this "clique" is to just be nice to people.
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 8:40, 7 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
so that new people are allowed to post pretty much instantly, but that people who are likely to post "OMG FAIL" or "You'd better look out because everyone is about to flame you" (unless the new people just aren't getting the point) don't actually see them.
That way newbies would only be seen by nice supportive people for the first week/month/whatever and the only real way for people to join this "clique" is to just be nice to people.
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 8:40, 7 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
im all for this
because we have had newbies get FP's
but that is just a tiny fraction of the trolls we normally get...
...yes i believe that we shouldn't flame them (and its fun sometimes when you know its a massive fail)
however, these people are given a week to see how the board works and what to do and not to do...
that combined with an (albeit slightly vague) FAQ there shouldnt be a problem
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 10:46, Reply)
because we have had newbies get FP's
but that is just a tiny fraction of the trolls we normally get...
...yes i believe that we shouldn't flame them (and its fun sometimes when you know its a massive fail)
however, these people are given a week to see how the board works and what to do and not to do...
that combined with an (albeit slightly vague) FAQ there shouldnt be a problem
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 10:46, Reply)
why not just get rid of the L-plates, they just mark people out for flaming
especially on /talk
or, OR, just give them a fixed sig that say "Do not flame the noob"
or just remove the signup page, that'd fix everything
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 11:25, Reply)
especially on /talk
or, OR, just give them a fixed sig that say "Do not flame the noob"
or just remove the signup page, that'd fix everything
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 11:25, Reply)
If they are foolhardy enough to enter /talk they should be flamed for their own good
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 11:39, Reply)
How about
An option of 'hide learner-plate posts'.
That way, all those people who get all huffy when their posts get pushed down can choose to (temporarily) ignore learners without getting a massive list.
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 14:26, Reply)
An option of 'hide learner-plate posts'.
That way, all those people who get all huffy when their posts get pushed down can choose to (temporarily) ignore learners without getting a massive list.
( , Sun 18 May 2008, 14:26, Reply)
« Go Back