Annoying words and phrases
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
« Go Back
can't agree with that
language evolves. Text is now a verb. If you disagree then you aren't allowed to say you are going to phone someone ever.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:11, closed)
language evolves. Text is now a verb. If you disagree then you aren't allowed to say you are going to phone someone ever.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:11, closed)
Well, as Vipros has said
it has now become a verb, sadly.
But worse still is that it seems to have lost its final t. So the past tense has become 'texed', rather than 'texted'.
That gets right on my tits.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:15, closed)
it has now become a verb, sadly.
But worse still is that it seems to have lost its final t. So the past tense has become 'texed', rather than 'texted'.
That gets right on my tits.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:15, closed)
Well, quite.
Is it too much to ask that, if these morons are going to mangle the English language, they at least pay some attention to the grammatical structures while they do it?
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:17, closed)
Is it too much to ask that, if these morons are going to mangle the English language, they at least pay some attention to the grammatical structures while they do it?
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:17, closed)
And, even more annoying
"Texes", as in "I never read his texes, Jeremy. You can do a lie-detector test if you want"
For fuck's sake, it's 'Texts'. I understand that language evolves, but why in god's name would you want to extend a one-syllable word to two? (And anyway, everyone knows that 'Texes' are those things the Queen takes from us to spend on roast swan.)
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:32, closed)
"Texes", as in "I never read his texes, Jeremy. You can do a lie-detector test if you want"
For fuck's sake, it's 'Texts'. I understand that language evolves, but why in god's name would you want to extend a one-syllable word to two? (And anyway, everyone knows that 'Texes' are those things the Queen takes from us to spend on roast swan.)
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:32, closed)
Is this true?
I've never heard "texed". It's an especially fuckwitted past participle as "text" and "texed" sound almost exactly the same.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 15:44, closed)
I've never heard "texed". It's an especially fuckwitted past participle as "text" and "texed" sound almost exactly the same.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 15:44, closed)
Yup
Definitely true. I've heard lots of people saying it, and not just kids.
( , Fri 9 Apr 2010, 9:11, closed)
Definitely true. I've heard lots of people saying it, and not just kids.
( , Fri 9 Apr 2010, 9:11, closed)
So what do you say instead?
Is it really so bad to say 'I texted him' or 'I'll text you' rather than 'I wrote a text to him' or 'I'll send you a text'?
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:30, closed)
Is it really so bad to say 'I texted him' or 'I'll text you' rather than 'I wrote a text to him' or 'I'll send you a text'?
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:30, closed)
« Go Back