Annoying words and phrases
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
« Go Back
anyone who is not a lawyer
has no idea what hellish hackneyed phrases we have to trot out time and time again. "these particulars are embarrassing in their want of specificity" is my favourite.
we have a colleague who has a whole raft of silly phrases. but the most annoying by miles is "dare i say it". innocuous enough in itself, although the irritation factor is magnified by a factor of 137 when he says it 137 times a day. but he puts it... at the END of the sentence.
"this costs estimate is ridiculous. dare i say it."
"how do you walk in those heels? dare i say it."
"the lease has to be completed before the expiry of the agreement, which could be tricky. dare i say it."
yes. clearly you DO dare to say it, as you have ALREADY said it. argh!
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 18:56, Reply)
has no idea what hellish hackneyed phrases we have to trot out time and time again. "these particulars are embarrassing in their want of specificity" is my favourite.
we have a colleague who has a whole raft of silly phrases. but the most annoying by miles is "dare i say it". innocuous enough in itself, although the irritation factor is magnified by a factor of 137 when he says it 137 times a day. but he puts it... at the END of the sentence.
"this costs estimate is ridiculous. dare i say it."
"how do you walk in those heels? dare i say it."
"the lease has to be completed before the expiry of the agreement, which could be tricky. dare i say it."
yes. clearly you DO dare to say it, as you have ALREADY said it. argh!
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 18:56, Reply)
« Go Back