I'm not suggesting that it isn't possible
for the striker to send the keeper the wrong way. What I'm saying is that the commentator doesn't know whether this happened or not. It could equally be that the keeper has a set pattern. It's the assumption that it must be because of the taker's action that the keeper dives the wrong way that is incorrect. If the keeper's actions were wholly dictated by taker then the commentators should also say, (when the keeper goes the right way) that the taker sent the keeper the right way.
(Cave Duck, Thu 15 Apr 2010, 0:16, Reply)