Not an expert...
but didn't science also go to show that the drug was dangerous and it was stopped? And all in a far shorter time frame that the conspiracy nuts who have been going on for a decade?

At least science knows when it makes mistakes and owns up.
( Batter Pudding Hurler is a figment of your imagination, Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:38, 1 reply)

it took more than a decade to stop putting lead in petrol.
and to stop using DDT. and to stop using CFCs in aerosols.
( Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:54, closed)

You appear to have over-estimated
the influence of scientists.
( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Tue 6 Dec 2011, 22:08, closed)

Big Companies slow down sceince
Lead, DDT, CFC are companies slowing down the science facts. (Again I am no expert and can't be arsed to look up the facts so working on memory here). Once science spotted the mistakes, the companies dragged their feet. but eventually they found solutions - again with science.

The example from the OP is very different as he is using totally unrelated "facts" and forcing them to "fit" a "theory" while ignoring all the other information that shows the "theory" is bullsh*t. That ain't science, that is selling books to weak minded people.
( Batter Pudding Hurler is a figment of your imagination, Tue 6 Dec 2011, 22:16, closed)

CFCs were ultimately replaced by propane and butane.
The trade-off being that while propane and butane are natural gases and don't have such a harmful effect on the upper atmosphere, they're much more flammable and explosive. To satisfy safety regulations, most aerosol-filling factories needed to have the cans sealed in a separate annexe - and it had to be designed to fall away from the main building in the event of a structurally compromising explosion.
( The Mock TurtIe ™ --- Thinks you are a cunt, on, Tue 6 Dec 2011, 22:51, closed)