First World Problems
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
It's effective
in the sense that "it has an effect". Since that effect is "shows them that larger, stronger people can use physical violence rather than rational explanation" with a side order of "the person hitting me is too stupid to offer a rational explanation" the overall result may not be quite what was intended.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 17:32, 2 replies)
in the sense that "it has an effect". Since that effect is "shows them that larger, stronger people can use physical violence rather than rational explanation" with a side order of "the person hitting me is too stupid to offer a rational explanation" the overall result may not be quite what was intended.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 17:32, 2 replies)
so you'd only hit children when they're too young to understand the rationale
that'll end well.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 20:09, closed)
that'll end well.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 20:09, closed)
don't be silly! the child learns that violence is the best reaction.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 20:16, closed)
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 20:16, closed)
Just pointing out that rationally explaining to young Jimmy that putting marbles up his nose is silly because he will have to go to hospital to have them pulled out, is unlikely to be effective.
It can be equally pointless trying to rationally explain things to teenagers.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 21:06, closed)
Marbles up the nose?
at least you didn't do the usual knitting needle in the plug socket or hand in the fire that proponents of violence against children usually wheel out.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 21:12, closed)
at least you didn't do the usual knitting needle in the plug socket or hand in the fire that proponents of violence against children usually wheel out.
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 21:12, closed)
Four year olds are perfectly capable of rational thought
as long as you appreciate that they don't know as much as older people and that their rational thought is therefore rather more simplistic than ours.
"Don't do that because I say so" is just as logical an explanation to them as "Don't do that because otherwise I will hit you"
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 22:52, closed)
as long as you appreciate that they don't know as much as older people and that their rational thought is therefore rather more simplistic than ours.
"Don't do that because I say so" is just as logical an explanation to them as "Don't do that because otherwise I will hit you"
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 22:52, closed)
No it isn't.
Because their tiny unformed minds are not capable of understanding actions and consequences without physical reinforcement.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 8:20, closed)
Because their tiny unformed minds are not capable of understanding actions and consequences without physical reinforcement.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 8:20, closed)
It's effective
because done properly, it's an instantaneous negative re-enforcement and easily associated with the behaviour that caused it. Simply cause and effect without any longwinded shit....... works on anything with a short attention span. Usually does not need to be repeated for the same issue.
( , Thu 8 Mar 2012, 0:48, closed)
because done properly, it's an instantaneous negative re-enforcement and easily associated with the behaviour that caused it. Simply cause and effect without any longwinded shit....... works on anything with a short attention span. Usually does not need to be repeated for the same issue.
( , Thu 8 Mar 2012, 0:48, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread