Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:22, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
is a metaphor for the extremes of body modification in our society. Or an allegory for how science is dehumanising us
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:27, Reply)
than a really sick idea which he turned into a film. The director of a Serbian Film actually thinks you can use allegory in films.
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:29, Reply)
Just had a joke with his mates about how paedophiles should have their mouths grafted tp the arses of obese truckers. And thus, a classic was born...
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:35, Reply)
The Hollywood ones are about gore over substance. The foreign ones tend to be ultraviolent to make a point.
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:29, Reply)
It is not a political allegory, it is just an excuse for a very grotesque film. Allegory doesn't work on film, no matter what the director says.
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:30, Reply)
Not an excuse to show a frightened lass with her tits out pleading.
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:32, Reply)
I read the synopsis and it was awful. I couldn't spot any meaning to it at all. Suggestion is sometimes more powerful than exactly the same tripe that Saw 261 gives us.
Edit: in fact trying to give it a reason makes it worse. It's a perverse kind of justification. Pretty much the point that Al made above I guess
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:36, Reply)
But I know I don't like Saw films. I don't know I don't like this until I see it.
It could just be that I want to see if I can handle watching it.*
I realise these are shit arguments but I've been smoking and watching Peep Show in bed all afternoon/evening. My brain is not working at the moment.
(, Sun 2 Jan 2011, 23:41, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread