b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1045468 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

It's also not really a profession, just a job.

(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 15:47, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
I think it is a profession.
Most women who do it do no other type of work in their lives.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 15:56, Reply)
That's not a profession
that's a job. A profession requires specific educational training as far as I remember i.e. doctor, teacher, lawyer. Being a prostitute means lying on your back and faking not being repulsed.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:01, Reply)
Have you tried it?
I can't imagine it's easy.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:05, Reply)
I hadn't considered it before
but if I was paying for it, I'd want the hooker to be some kind of medal winning sex athelete who could and would blow my mind.

I think that is what my brain would assume to be the norm, rather than the exception. It's a bit odd in here.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:13, Reply)
Whereas looking at the inhabitants
of St Pauls in Bristol what you're going to get is broken-down old nag
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:20, Reply)

mind cock
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:20, Reply)
I'd find it hard
but no offence the type of people who go into it don't really seem to find it hard. But yes, physically I imagine it's rather easy
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:13, Reply)
The type of people who go into it don't really seem to find it hard?
What is the 'type' and how do you know how flippantly they have entered the 'business' or whether they did it willingly at all?
That's really mean.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:18, Reply)
There is no type
*shrugs* the point I was trying to make is they're still doing it. If it was that hard they would find some way to quit. And if they did it unwillingly- that is rape, and they don't find it easy obviously. We're talking though about women who have presumably consented.

The reason *I* would find it hard is I have no motivating desperation or reason why I have to and thus the idea of sex for money is repulsive.

Sorry if it came across as being horrible though
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:21, Reply)
Some of them have 'boyfriends' who beat them.
Some of them have been being used this way since they were teenagers and have such little self-esteem or independent thought that they can't even comtemplate a way out.
You can't assume that because they can't/won't do what you would do in that situation that they deserve everything they get, and really love lying on their back pretending not to be repulsed.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:25, Reply)
Doesn't sound like
an argument in favour of prostitution to me. Nor is it the sort of thing that will be stamped out by legalisation.

How on earth have I said they deserve everything they get? They are obviously and patently victims. They are also victims of a system that doesn't actually seem to see much wrong with this going ahead and people paying money to take advantage of them. Legalising it isn't going to change anything.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:30, Reply)
I wasn't talking about legalising it
I was talking about how you were implying it was easy and that if they wanted to leave they'd have left by now, and how there is a 'type'.
The world has many shades of grey, that's all I'm saying. Using terms like 'type' will get us nowhere. If you're debating something like this you can't make assumptions or bring your prejudices into it.
I'm not debating whether or not to legalise it, but the way you expressed your views made me feel a bit sad.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:34, Reply)
To be fair
I made it quite clear that when I said easy I was talking about physically, rather than mentally. People are tougher mentally than they are physically.

We may have to agree to disagree but I can't ever find prostitution right or morally acceptable, and I thought I'd made it relatively clear that it isn't the prostitutes I'm blaming but the demand for them.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:42, Reply)
I never said it was right or morally acceptable, so I don't know exactly what we're disagreeing on.
I'll ruminate on things like this, but I don't get vehement because I reckon that there's always something life can teach me.
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:45, Reply)
Haha I think we might have got
our wires crossed. I can be a bit judgemental sometimes I know but usually it's just because I get too impassioned about things
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:51, Reply)
if you are saying the demand for them is the problem
maybe more women just need to be slags?

you've only got yourselves to blame here
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:47, Reply)
Are you officially starting the Campaign for More Whores?

(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:48, Reply)
no
more slags = less whores
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:49, Reply)
But that's not catchy enough!

(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:52, Reply)
I'll work on it

(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:53, Reply)
Oh, for crying out loud...
fewer whores, you dribbling oaf!
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:53, Reply)
that was deliberate
it's a slogan that dumb slags need to understand, and by this I do not in any way mean Roota or Amberl
(, Mon 17 Jan 2011, 16:54, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1