Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
And secondly, even if there is the odd bit of "banter" in a pub, that's not at work, is it? Sky can't be seen to tolerate that in a work environment.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:18, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
it's illegal under EU and UK employment law.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:26, Reply)
except you can't blithely ignore international law when you're broadcasting those breaches across the world.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:33, Reply)
it's pretty fucking hard not to, no?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:33, Reply)
And a number of people on there have mentioned daytime magazine show 'Loose Women' as a show that seems to thrive on sexism. (I've not seen Loose Women, but I understand the premise of the the show is a gaggle of women whinging about men).
Is that acceptable, but a private conversation isn't?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:37, Reply)
Or are the comments made on that, acceptable as it is within the context of the show?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:42, Reply)
I think it's a vile programme mainly because of this. The fact that TV bosses at a different channel haven't sacked them but Grey has been sacked doesn't mean he shouldn't have been.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:45, Reply)
but it is more likely to be accepted because institutional sexism on the part of women towards men is not and has never been a problem in society, but vice versa is.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:52, Reply)
or is the reason it's acceptable because men understand it means fuck all and don't go mental about it.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:59, Reply)
If you got caught on camera stealing something twice, would you turn around and say "Oh, it's OK. Everyone does it."?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:34, Reply)
But in all seriousness, no of course not. But in this particular case I think the punishment is extreme. Ideally sexism and racism and most other ism's wouldn't exist but they do and not every case is black and white (no pun intended). I am not trying to upset or annoy anyone, nor am I condoning what Andy Gray did. In my opinion he has been rashly dismissed and it probably warrants a suspension, then a review following an investigation.
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:40, Reply)
do you get what I mean or am I talking double dutch?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:42, Reply)
But the fact that he's done it repeatedly (in the space of a month!) shows he doesn't think it's wrong and won't change. Do you think no one had a quiet word with him about the December thing?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:43, Reply)
Let's argue it that way, shall we?
(, Tue 25 Jan 2011, 17:51, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread