b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1060757 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

HAHAHAH
Your noobness amuses me
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:49, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
To be honest I thought he meant the real Stig.
But I'm a silly old fool.
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:49, Reply)
HAHAHA
YOUR noobness amuses me
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:50, Reply)
ok I'm done

(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:50, Reply)
Hellooooo Badger.
*waves*
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:52, Reply)
HAI BGB
I AM GOING TO WATCH TOP GEAR BUT THEN I'LL BE BACK!
*SNOGS*
*RUNS*
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:56, Reply)
Before my time, obviously.

(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:51, Reply)
It was in the days of HSH threads that were all straight down
and people had to post @[user] in the subject lines

They were good days
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 19:55, Reply)
I think I arrived about 2 months before nested replies.
I remember Edmund hadn't been outed as a creep just then, becky posted a lot, Kaol was around, and Maladicta and Hair Pot were doing BDSM role-play on open board.
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 20:03, Reply)
sounds like it used to be cool :/
I think I arrived at the tail end of the HSH threads. There was some flouncing, then there were less
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 20:10, Reply)
I remember the awful point where some people decided that /ot was divided into "fluffy" and "cunty/spikey"
and decided to "unite the two".


EDIT: After a quick search, that was around the Chompy VS. WBM incident. That was top internetting.
(, Sun 30 Jan 2011, 20:11, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1