Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
way of going about things is a bit suspect. It should be "We have found every possible combination of particles which seems to explain all known possibilities, and can I have a lolly now please?" type of statement before they give up.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:53, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
so much as wedgying supersymmetry
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:55, Reply)
The can infer the properties of a particle before finding it. If they then put an experiment in place that will create the particle and detectors that can detect the properties, then run it for months and nothing comes up, it's time to look back at the theory.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 10:56, Reply)
It was more a comment on the simplified way that CERN are communicating with the media. I suppose I could buy New Scientist to find out, but it is so boring.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:01, Reply)
proves your point :(
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:06, Reply)
journalists are mostly stupid, people are mostly even more stupid than that. Things need to be dumbed down.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:04, Reply)
There should be telly and radio for smart people, and our vote should count twice at elections and that.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:09, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:09, Reply)
Like most people here I should think.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:12, Reply)
there are some things I will try and find out about, others I will find out about by accident, other things I will ignore until someone tells me in idiot language
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:13, Reply)
the problem is most reporters dropped science at GCSE
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 11:07, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread