Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
i mean, just say it was by googling the username of a 19 year old student because you are wondering how she could possibly still be single, would that be cool?
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 15:56, Reply)
They're awesome. But I'm more a water-starter than a fire-starter myself.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:00, Reply)
but to be googling it whilst other people are talking about your sexy flatmate charmander at the exact same time would be a huge coincidence, no??
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:02, Reply)
just seemed that the reaction to the mention of her was a google image search, and this merited some piss-taking for being a leetle bit creepy.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:07, Reply)
I do that all the time with friends, or if I want to insult Monty.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:08, Reply)
there's no defence to this, trust me. i'm a lawyer. in fact, i think you're making it worse for both of you.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:11, Reply)
Working for the defence all I have to do is make the jury doubt your version of events by offering up alternatives.
Why would I be making it worse for me?
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:14, Reply)
results in "ooh look what i just HAPPENED to have on my computer, what a coincidence" picture. no jury would buy that. case dismissed, go to jail, do not collect £200, you fucking nonce.
you are making it worse for you by defending this course of action. sad times.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:15, Reply)
Therefore you can't find him guilty.
Everyone's entitled to a fair defence, it's part of what makes our justice system.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:18, Reply)
i just need to prove it to the satisfaction of the jury. they'll take one look at him, and he'll be lucky to see daylight again before the age of 92.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:24, Reply)
Old women are the most judgmental of jury members, and if they like the look of him from the start then they've already made up their mind.
It's crazy, like female jurors are more likely to vote against a woman in a contested rape case (she says she said no, she was drunk, he says she consented), because she "dressed up like a slut, got drunk, it's her own fault". It's maddening, but worryingly common in those cases.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:28, Reply)
Would be a damned sight harder to achieve.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:03, Reply)
Leave it for several months, boom, plant-type.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:05, Reply)
A rock-type cake would be easy.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:08, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:11, Reply)
Though I didn't watch tv in university, nor did I own a gameboy, so my exposure to Pokemon was very limited.
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:15, Reply)
loosely based on pokemon. I think it took a couple of encounters for the players to work out that the 'throw these mushrooms and a little creature appears and help you fight' mechanism may have been plagerised
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:21, Reply)
I suspect there are other people on here who've larped, they're just lying low
(, Fri 25 Feb 2011, 16:25, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread