*arrives late to the debate*
I think it's a very good idea. I also think it is incredibly easy to understand, and I don't get why some people don't understand it.

Maybe I just don't understand it fully.

Evening everyone *waves*
( b3th Not shit. Not mod., Fri 15 Apr 2011, 17:51, 1 reply, 15 years ago)

It is exceptionally easy to understand
anyone who says it's too complicated should be shot in the face for being too stupid to remember to breathe at the right time.
(Bazongaloid, Fri 15 Apr 2011, 17:52, Reply)

well that's alright then
Can you be trusted not to get my brother into trouble this weekend? I've heard you're a bad influence on him.
( b3th Not shit. Not mod., Fri 15 Apr 2011, 17:54, Reply)

Its more efficient than the French system of holding new elections each time a candidate is eliminated.

( willenium Fist bump for verification, Fri 15 Apr 2011, 17:56, Reply)

I refuse to believe that people can't put things in order of 1-4, or whatever it is.
It _is_ complicated, just not for the voter.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 15 Apr 2011, 18:10, Reply)