Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I'm not frightened of failure at all, just don't want to be stuck with ridiculous debts for ever.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:24, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
I think it's awful that you finish Uni having to pay the equivalent of a small mortgage.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:29, Reply)
Madness.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:38, Reply)
I don't understand how anyone is supposed to be able to afford it without getting into debt for the rest of their lifes. Maybe you can study in Spain, where it still is free (or almost)
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:41, Reply)
well, then, I don't know what to suggest. I wouldn't want to get into such a debt myself at the moment.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:50, Reply)
if they got educated, they might start thinking they had the same rights as rich people. Imagine the chaos!
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:52, Reply)
It's a societal failure to understand that higher education is not some right everyone has. It is a right of intellectual priviledge, not financial. If we accepted that, stopped trying to get everyone who can tie their fucking shoelaces together into uni, then we wouldn't have a HE system that cannot be supported by the state.
That, and the tories, of course.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:58, Reply)
when it comes to this. A large proportion of people won't pay up front, but use loans, so it makes no difference what your circumstances are before you go to uni, you are still in the same boat.
My folks are reasonably high income middle-class, and as such I was screwed at uni because I get the max fees (at the time) and minimum loans etc. Poor people were a shitload better off than I was.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:00, Reply)
Who's going to pay for our pensions. No, wait, if they have no education, they have no good jobs, they're on benefits... I see a flaw on this plan.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:01, Reply)
if we weren't so ridiculously obsessed with getting 50% of the population into higher education.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:55, Reply)
I don't know why it's so importanta that almost everybody has to have a degree. There are really good jobs, well paid, safe and stable that don't need a degree. My brother didn't study a degree, and he's got a job for 4 years now, happy as a bunny, with a fixed income. My sister study a degree and she's on permanent search of scholarships to pay for her next year's research; can't afford a house or even holidays.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:03, Reply)
didn't go to uni.
I'm glad I did, not least because I met Mrs V there, but because it's hard to get into civil engineering without having done so these days.
If I were to go through it now though I'd seriously consider an apprenticeship or something instead.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:05, Reply)
I like my job and couldn't have got it without a degree. However, I wonder what would have happened if instead of listening to my mother and got into Uni, I would just done what I wanted and keep writing. I wouldn't have met Mark, probably, but I don't think I'd have done too badly.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:24, Reply)
it's a disgrace, to ask young people to put such an ammount of money to pay for their education. I don't know what I would do, finish the University and having to pay a loan like that.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:51, Reply)
and the debt of the average american as well as the debt of their country, is just massive. Other countries manage with free or almost free education just fine.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:05, Reply)
that has a properly democratically elected government, a safe and stable economy, and the same level of HE participation as the UK, that still has a fully state funded HE system. Seeing as how (looking at Europe at least) I think I can rule out every country on the basis of at least one of those four points.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:19, Reply)
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:22, Reply)
I hate the way the HE system is here, but I'm pretty certain the reasons are much more deep seated than a generic "blame the government again" ... So I am genuinely interested in an example of how it can work and be free. I just don't think there are any. It's very easy to talk about the grass being greener when you can't actually see the other grass.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:25, Reply)
I studied in Spain, as did all my friends. None of them were rich, we were all medium-low incomes. I got a bit of a reduction on my fees for being in a big family and for having good marks, but I know other friends who didn't. None of us or our parents had to get into debt to pay for uni.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:28, Reply)
both on the grounds of lower % HE participation and on not even being close to having a stable economy. Sorry. It's all very well slinging public funding at education but if you bankrupt the country and the Eurozone has to bail you out, that's what's known as a technical fail.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:29, Reply)
at least not yet, no one has bailed Spain, and, as I've said before, the problem with our debt is the corruption and the millions that go to politicians for doing nothing; as they can have 2 public salaries (unless everybody else), don't pay taxes, get a fixed pension after 8 years of work...
But yes, lower %HE helps too, and I think that's right. And I think that's why the UK is having so much trouble. Too many people going to Uni.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:35, Reply)
but, regardless, Spain doesn't really count on my conditions above. Although I see advantages in proportional fees system like in Spain. We used to have something similar here, but it's very expensive to manage and very easy to defraud or exploit (kids of rich divorcees tended to get full grants, for example) ... but if you can get round that, it's a good system.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:47, Reply)
but people with lower incomes do get it for free. People with the highest marks get it for free too. Mediocre and rich people pay for everyone else to go to Uni.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:26, Reply)
you complain that people with medium incomes have to pay the same as people with high incomes. If you're good or poor you get it for free, then the people who pays is who has to pay.
Problem is that, as I see it, you have to be very poor to get it for free here, and if you go past the mark, you have to pay the full bill.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:36, Reply)
I think it is to do with ease of adminstration of the system, but that doesn't make it right.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:48, Reply)
it's an inevitability of the system as it is. The fundamental flaw is in mindset.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:59, Reply)
how do other countries manage? Less money for benefits, less allowing bussiness to evade taxes, and more money to Universities.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:06, Reply)
(the benefits thing really is a massive load of Mail inspired bullshit, you know that, right? we really don't spend a fortune on benefits here. Try, oh, say, Ireland as a comparison)
Also, a lot of other countries allow high levels of private funding of universities. Financially useful, but academically and morally very questionable.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:13, Reply)
that seems like a huge amount of money to me.
(, Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:21, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread