The argument is categorically unresolvable
Atheists will point out that there is no proof for the existence of God and believers will cite the necessity of faith. Neither party is likely to convince the other.
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Wed 4 May 2011, 14:06, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

Yes it's a fairly pointless argument to have
but that doesn't mean that one side isn't right.

It's like AV (yeah I went there) despite infallible logic in favour of the change, some people just go LALALALALALA!
(Bazongaloid, Wed 4 May 2011, 14:09, Reply)

Because a huge amount of complete bullshit has been published in favour of the counterargument, Al
Religion. Not AV.
(Darth Foxtrot A one-man army dedicated to making fetch happen, Wed 4 May 2011, 14:12, Reply)

:(

( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Wed 4 May 2011, 14:23, Reply)

Faith is turning the weakness of lack of evidence into a strength
by saying that God/Allah/the FSM doesn't provide evidence specifically so that we can demonstrate faith.

I feel uncomfortable with a supreme being who says people who base their decisions on feelings and instinct are better than those who use logic and reason. I'm not saying they should be considered worse, I just don't think they should be elevated above rational people.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Wed 4 May 2011, 14:13, Reply)