b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1198896 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I have to admit I don't really know what they are
I know they're negatively charged, have something to do with electricity and it's too simple to say they ate arranged in shells of 2 8 8 or something but yeah.

I have no concept of how the fuck they work and where they are.
Oh, and they have no mass? Bloody hell gcses were a long time ago.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:17, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
I know the difference between a Manet and a Monet painting.
I bet Al doesn't.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:19, Reply)
Manet did the one of the people in the park, or am I wrong?
The really odd but pretty one.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:21, Reply)
With the naked lady?

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:22, Reply)
Yup, first one on google images for Manet.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:25, Reply)
Le déjeuner sur l'herbe.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:26, Reply)
I like it.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:33, Reply)
it's a vowel
as any fule no.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:24, Reply)
Psst!
They have a mass, it's about 9.11 x 10-31kg. The massless particles you're thinking of are photons.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:20, Reply)
I wasn't sure of the latter thing.
Having a weightless particle makes no sense to me.

Light is another thing I do not fucking understand. can't even remember the angle of refraction.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:24, Reply)
It is dependant on the medum in which the light is being refracted

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:25, Reply)
We had to learn the one for glass, I think.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:27, Reply)
No one really "understands" light
Debate has raged for hundreds of years over whether it's a wave or a particle, and since some time around 1906 people have grudgingly come to accept that it's some strange amalgamation of the two (i.e., it exhibits some properties of a particle but also some properties of a wave)
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:28, Reply)
Yeah, I remember reading that.
The Only thing I really remember is red shift, as at the time I had no idea what it was so drummed it into my head.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:32, Reply)
They have mass
it's just very small when compared to the whole of the atom. Which itself is very small when compared to anything you can see.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:22, Reply)
they weigh about as much as a duck.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:26, Reply)
BURN THEM

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:31, Reply)
Then serve with roast potatoes and some veg.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:35, Reply)
*thunderous witch fives*

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:38, Reply)
Fucking science.
How does it work?
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:27, Reply)
You mix it in a beaker and drink it.

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:29, Reply)
Any mass is small when compared to you

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:30, Reply)
Except the mass of air contained in your vagina
which, in a strange coincidence, weighs as much as me.
(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:32, Reply)
I knew I shouldn't have added that additional harbour

(, Thu 12 May 2011, 14:34, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1