Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
"fuck you the british public you're all thick" because of the bring back hanging petitions that are going on, then realised less than 400 people have signed it so who gives a shit.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:18, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
The Government no longer takes any notice of demonstrations just outside it's front door, they're really not going to care about 400 people who want legalised murder.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:20, Reply)
must have a debate and vote in the commons.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:21, Reply)
"And now Madam Speaker, I must draw the attention of the House to an online petition that wants to reintroduce the hanging sentence.
"Shall we do it?
"Show of hands?
"0 for 2, let's move on"
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:23, Reply)
I'd also like MP's to heavily patronise the people bringing them forward.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:25, Reply)
Anyone in favour of capital punishment should be willing to make the decision to kill in cold blood, carry out the cold-blooded killing, take care of the cadaver, deal with the family and take care of any miscarriages of justice which result in a wrongful execution.
Peddlers of homeopathy should have to take only homeopathic medicine for every illness they get, no matter how serious. Got cancer? Oh dear, have these sugar pills and drink some of this water. That'll sort you right out.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:21, Reply)
Because they continue to demonstrate that they are completely out of touch with the population in their sentencing of criminals we want you to introduce legislation to remove judges from the criminal justice system once any person has been found guilty of an offence. At that point of a trial the usefulness of the judge (in maintaining the legality of proceedings) is redundant. Sentencing needs to be more in keeping with the opinion of the public opinions of this country so panels of 'sentencers' consisting of randomly selected taxpaying individuals need to be established round the country so that sentencing is appropriate to the part of the country the crime is committed. Judges demonstrate most admirably that it is not possible for them to see that as far as the public is concerned 'the punishment MUST fit the crime'.
*1 signature
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:23, Reply)
Why is it that the stupider the person, the cleverer they think they are?
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:27, Reply)
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:39, Reply)
West country would be burning "Witches" by the end of the week.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:28, Reply)
we're just really good at covering it up
you know all those people who get washed out to sea?
they were all witches.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:28, Reply)
we just tell everyone they get washed out to sea.
but even if they float, they can still die from exposure
also: ginsters pasties. that's not beef
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:31, Reply)
The "let's take impartiality out of the sentencing of criminals and put it into the hands of the baying crowd of proles the Sun's whipped into a bloody-frenzy because it's fairer" petition.
Lovely.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:27, Reply)
Excellent idea, they could call it a jury
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:29, Reply)
"We, the undersigned, would like mob rule in place of the current legal system."
It's not a good idea. It wasn't even a particularly good song.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 13:19, Reply)
But the people who are in it are so fucking thick, they do proper racist football-style chants and get into fights and start on shop keepers and families. If they truely believed their rehtoric, like, they really thought extemest islam is a threat, and I know to say 'innocent muslims' implies that there are 'non-innocent muslims', but I mean, they should stay clear of those who don't cause any bother and treat people like that like they would anyone else, so it gives less ammo for their opposers.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 12:42, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread