Can it include the number of pixels that Virgin have?

(Bazongaloid, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:28, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

I expect the reason you can't tell the difference
is because you're trying to watch it on a 1998 Sony Trinitron.
( Kroney, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:31, Reply)

Seriously
Please tell me why Virgin haven't tried to extend their cable network within the most densely populated bit of London.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:32, Reply)

I have no idea, really.
But Virgin use NTL's old network. I don't know how much more cable they've laid down since taking them over but it's got to be fucking expensive to rip up London's streets.
( Kroney, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:35, Reply)

I'm pretty sure they haven't laid any.
But if you're going to lay it anywhere, surely London would be the place to do it since you're more likely to get a return on your investment.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:37, Reply)

You'd imagine so
I'm just wondering whether there's just not been a big enough incentive for them to do so. You'd want to be certain of a large customer base if you're going to apply to multiple councils to let you dig their roads up and take on the no doubt exorbitant installation costs .
( Kroney, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:40, Reply)

Actually, looking at their coverage map
Virgin really don't cover that many areas at all.
( Kroney, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:47, Reply)

I would like to know too.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 30 Aug 2011, 11:35, Reply)