
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I am leaning towards the Lamb Spiedini or the Wild Boar Sausages, anyway.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:04, Reply)

Because I ate that and thought it was good.
I may as well just invite Jamie round to jizz down my throat then.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:04, Reply)

he'd probably send one of those ASBO kids to do it anyway.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:05, Reply)

I have always enjoyed well-seasoned tan-coloured mince. My great grandma made it a lot.
It's just if someone is expecting a bolognese sauce they might be a little surprised.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:06, Reply)

it's not supposed to have tomatoes in it.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:13, Reply)

I know too many italian people.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:14, Reply)

it genuinely isn't. It's a slow-cooked meat ragu with a small quantity (like a couple of tablespoons) of tomato puree for colour and richness only. Even Wikipedia accepts that.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:17, Reply)

That contains tomatoes.
Case closed.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:18, Reply)

Plus, it's a tiny amount and it's only to change the colour.
Soffritto, veal, pork, stock, wine, maybe milk. herbs and seasoning and a tiny bit of puree to colour it.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:24, Reply)

I said it's red and they put more than a tiny bit, because they like it coloured.
ALSO, TOMATO PURÉE CONTAINS TOMATO. That makes meals with puree inside them meals that contain tomato.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:26, Reply)

I suspect you'd get fairly short shrift suggesting that one of the ingredients of thai green curry was anchovies.
If I'd have meant it had nothing tomato-based in it I'd have said "no tomato" not "no tomatoes".
Which, I grant you, is a very subtle difference, and easily missed, but I'm having a cunt of a week so I'm going to be pointlessly belligerent about it.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:30, Reply)

that anyone with a fish or tomato allergy would disagree with this though.
But as you say, it's a fine distinction.
This is why I love B3ta. Where else could I be discussing what constitutes something having tomatoes in it at 9.38 on a Thursday morning?
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:38, Reply)

Peanut allergy sufferers can fuck off though. Making me eat pretzels instead of nuts on planes just because their mothers didn't eat any peanuts during pregnency because they are scared of everything The Daily Mail tells them to be scared of.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:50, Reply)

I stand corrected. I thought you meant tomato of any description.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:18, Reply)

Ey ey ba day ba wadladie day,
Ay um ba day,
Ba day ba wadladie day,
Ey ey ba day ba wadladie day,
Ay um ba da- ay um ba da-da-da-da wadladie day!
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:23, Reply)

I'm going to fucking hunt you down and kill you slowly. Regardless of any previous positivity I may have had towards you.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:25, Reply)

because I can't get it out of my head now.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:26, Reply)

It bloody should! It shouldn't have a lot of the shit we put in it, but it should definitely have tomato.
Apparently it also should have milk, mind you, which makes my stomach turn a little.
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:15, Reply)

it has no tomatoes in it. Trust me on this.
It's become so bastardised away from Bologna that, yeah, it pretty much always does have tomoatoes in. I'm not getting food Nazi, I don't care, it tastes good either way, but if the fat-tounged monkey makes it in the traditional way in his restaurant I'm afraid he is right
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:21, Reply)

Crossed wires (or a slightly different definition of what constitutes having tomatoes in it, I guess).
( , Thu 8 Sep 2011, 9:22, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread