The only sense in which she's fucking stunning
is if you picked her up and used her to stun someone with a blow to the head.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 12:31, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)

I think she's got by because she's not as minging as Meg Griffin

( Roota zweeeeeoooooowm, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 12:37, Reply)

noooooooo!
i think she may actually be the most gorgeous woman in the world. have you SEEN "forgetting sarah marshall" ?

see, this is another example of you being Wrong!
( rachelswipe with a fork, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 12:43, Reply)

I'd smash one up it.
Fact.
( Kroney, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 12:48, Reply)

Unless you enjoy shagging Slow Lorises (slow Lorii?)
Her eyes are way too big for her head, her face is too skinny and angular and she's got the body of a teenage boy. See also Moss, Kate and recently, Knightley, Kiera. Although she at least has an alright face.

If this is me being wrong, I'd rather powersand my own balls than be "right", thanks.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 12:54, Reply)

Ellis-Bextor, Sophie.
You don't like cat-face.
( Kroney, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 12:59, Reply)

Ellis-Bextor's rhomboid features are an abomination.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 13:02, Reply)

I absolutely would

( Kroney, Fri 9 Sep 2011, 13:04, Reply)