Is slander still slander if you belive it at the time?
Now we know that Amanda didn't do the murder, maybe the person who she said did the murder, did the murder?
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:09, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)

Woah, woah, woah
We don't know anything of the sort, we know her conviction for the murder has been quashed due to unreliable evidence, but we don't know whether she actually was involved.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)

I think it's unlikely that she or her boyfriend were involved

(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:12, Reply)

I think it's unlikely that you haven't fucked your sister.

(Bazongaloid, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)

I think it's unlikely that you will ever stop repeating the same joke

(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:14, Reply)

I like to think she didn't do the murder on account of her aquittal.
Thing is, I know the whole "No smoke without fire" thing, but without that, it means that whoever is up on court for anything will always possibly be guilty even if they are told they're not involved by the courts.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:16, Reply)

I'm not implying that she did it
I'm just saying that a bold statement of "Now we know that Amanda didn't do the murder" is incorrect.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:19, Reply)

take a look at the evidence
obviously we'll never know the whole story, but I don't think there was anything that said she was at the crime scene, that she had killed her friend or had any reason to.

She was stupid enough to lie at her first police interview, which looks bad, and she behaved oddly after the police turned up but that doesn't prove anything
(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)

I think someone else had already been convicted of the murder
Knox and her boyfriend were imprisoned because the police believed they were somehow involved.

Good question about the slander thing though, rightfully she should be let off that unless she knew he wasn't involved and deliberately set out to ruin him
(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:11, Reply)

The appeal covered that too
and the court held that she was still guilty.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)

fair enough then, don't know much about that case

(Quinton had to abandon other account as i broke it, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:14, Reply)

I think she was sentenced to 3 years for the slander, but as she's already served 4, they've let her off

( Agnostic Antichrist Baltimora, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:19, Reply)