Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
don't then tend to then complain that they are being persecuted for their beliefs, though. In general.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:12, 3 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
I'm all for a bit of gypsy recognition but I'm not having Clarkson running anything with people in it.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:16, Reply)
but he's so arrogant i'd probably shag him anyway
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:26, Reply)
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:41, Reply)
I've been on at least one Legalise Cannabis march in my yoof and people are forever banging on about speed cameras.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:16, Reply)
legitimate protest. That's nothing like the same as being caught for it, and whining that you are being persecuted because of your beliefs. Is it now?
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:20, Reply)
repeatedly. stop arguing for the sake of it.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:34, Reply)
I think this is an intersting discussion, because it's demonstrating what you've been saying all along, that emotive prejudices blinker public perception of actual facts in this case.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:44, Reply)
For the record, I dislike smelly hippies in general, I just dislike Daily Mail readers even more, it's an interesting interplay of prejudice.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:46, Reply)
If they can buy some shitty land they should be allowed to build a site on it. Developers flout planning laws with greenbelt or protected sites all the time. it IS a way of life, they ARE an ethnic group. Lots of them do apply the proper way and are refused anyway and it's for no other reason than people want them to 'just pack it in and stop being gypos'.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:24, Reply)
It's a way of life - no problem - but I don't see why their ethnicity is relevant, unless you're arguing they SHOULD be allowed to break laws because of their ethnicity? Because that would be rather silly.
If they want to travel - councils should support that - if they want to settle - they should go through the same channels as everyone else does that wants to build their own house. These particualr people are doing neither.
and "because sometimes a bigger boy does it and got away with it" is hardly a reasonable defence. Unless, again, you're arguing they should be treated more positively because of their ethnic group?
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:29, Reply)
as avenues are closing and it's getting harder to be a traveller these days.
I agree what you say about councils should support that, but if they don't, then where are all these people to go? I'm not a gypsy and I don't know how it is, but all of this has just brought out to me how much people despise them, you know, the accompanying comments apart from your sensible opinions on planning law and it makes me feel really fucking bad, so I feel I have to defend them because it's totally not on.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:36, Reply)
The emotive nature of the issue has totally overridden the actual issue itself (CQ has pointed this out a lot to be fair to the man). All I'm trying to do here is point out that not everyone who believes they should be evicted is a gypsy-hating cunt. I know plenty are, and that's very troubling to me, but there are sound, and fair, legal reasons too.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 12:43, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread