b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1472732 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

and/or stabbing marketing types.

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:01, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
*backs away slowly*

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:01, Reply)
Oh dear. And I was quite liking you too.

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:02, Reply)
It's prolly not marketing like you are thinking

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:08, Reply)
you mean not evil lying bullshit artists that the world would be better off without?

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:10, Reply)
ah well ok, then yes, that is me, hello *waves*
If you knew who my clients were you'd shit
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:12, Reply)
Well, you could always tell me.
Or I can just assume you work for Murdock.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:14, Reply)
I could, but it's not gonna happen!

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:14, Reply)
I figured that.
you're a secretive sort, ain't ya?
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:17, Reply)
yep, well after AdamQC posted a link to his work, the whole of talk trolled it

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:18, Reply)
That was rather silly of him.

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:20, Reply)
he was, is and will continue to be a fucking idiot

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:20, Reply)
Good point.
I got quite worried the other day when a colleague mailed me a link to a pic on b3tards. Luckily he wasn't the artist.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:20, Reply)
Anyway if you knew, you'd dislike me even more

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:21, Reply)
I doubt that would be possible for Monty at least : )

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:22, Reply)
he is an awful bully

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:23, Reply)
I thought I was quite good at it.
Gutted.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:25, Reply)
Like I say, I'm assuming you suck murdocks withered cock for a living
so it's not possible, although I assume you mean you work for the torries in some capacity. I can't say I'm surprised. But I hate sky more, I've worked with them.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:26, Reply)
none of the above you'll be pleased to hear

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:27, Reply)
Lolitician

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:27, Reply)
Hahaha!

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:03, Reply)
Bill said it best:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDW_Hj2K0wo
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:03, Reply)
Bill was a bit of a knob with terrible hair.

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:08, Reply)
Paranoid wanker.

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:08, Reply)
You know those times when you're wrong?
This is one of those.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:10, Reply)
He had some good points to make
but was essentially not actually very funny. To check I wasn't wrong on this I watched three hours of live footage and documentaries on television a few months ago. I only lolled once and that was one of his many 'talking to the police on acid' routines. One thing that really stood out is how little material he had - he really repeated himself A LOT.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:17, Reply)
Well, this is all true.
but you're still wrong, so there.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:21, Reply)
If he was dubbed a 'social commentator' I'd have no problem with the fellow at all.
I just query the 'comedian' tag.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:25, Reply)
I concur

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:25, Reply)
This is true of all comedians though.
It's just not all comedians have had their back catalogues and footage so ruthlessly pillaged and exploited.

I should stress I am using 'exploited' in the non 'wah, wah, poor Bill, he's been exploited' sense of the word.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:25, Reply)
I suppose a comic's gags are the equivalent to the songs a musician plays,
but having watched a few hours of the man he really didn't seem to have more than a few notable routines because across a live show and a two-hour doc shit was repeated several times over.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:30, Reply)
The thing is, this was a touring Comedian not a TV comedian.
And touring comedians will keep the same set for years, because people don't get familiar with it. Comedy wasn't about 'superstars' releasing a DVD every Christmas and having to write a whole new set every 12 months at that time.

Obviously we have no idea how prolific or otherwise Hicks may have been in a different era or different situation, but he certainly was no different in the quantity of his output than any obscure but working stand up comedian would be.

Add to that his relatively short career and the even more limited timespan in which he was actually well known enough to have any of his stuff recorded for posterity.

The difference between him and most is that he went stratospheric after he died, so there is only a limited pool to choose from. I think it's a combination of over-adulation and a life cut short that leaves documentarians repeating the same bits over and over.

I think about things like this too much, don't I?
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:37, Reply)
You comments are fair and I accept them.
For this reason I shall change back to 'he wasn't very funny' as my principal criticism.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:43, Reply)
Why not shag a marketing type woman and then kill her?

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:02, Reply)
Could work.
Mind you never met a woman in Marketing.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:04, Reply)
are you kidding, it's mainly women...

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:06, Reply)
Not in my industry
and I'd have no reason to share space with *spits on floor* marketing types outside of work.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:08, Reply)
Do you work in Iron smelting?

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:09, Reply)
Nope.
Interactive TV software, technology company innit? We have a few women now, but it's still less that 10 percent, lower still if you exclude HR.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:11, Reply)
well that's nerdy sort stuff I suppose, always male dominated

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:13, Reply)
Sadly so.
It's better than it was 10 years ago, but still overwhelmingly male.
(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:15, Reply)
He who smelt it dealt it.

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:21, Reply)
see me after class

(, Thu 15 Dec 2011, 17:22, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1