b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1478620 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

"but it's glandular"
yeah. If you have a fucking cake gland.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:24, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
Mmmmmm, sweetbread cake

(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:26, Reply)
What do you think of this
www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16275946
I'm thinking pretty stupid paranoia
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:30, Reply)
Hooray!
As if Ebola isn't enough.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:31, Reply)
Ebola is about as dangerous as my nutsack
On the grounds that it's what we scientifically term "a flouncing Mary of a virus"
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:33, Reply)
I can't confirm this as I've never been near your nutsack.

(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:34, Reply)
It's not really very dangerous.
unless you've got a fatal allergy to nuts.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:36, Reply)
That's good to know.

(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:37, Reply)
When they started comparing real life to a Hollywood movie, i gave up

(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:32, Reply)
I think it's faintly terrifying
not the science, I mean the idea that the US government should have a say in what you can and can't publish.

but, yeah, it's fairly fucking paranoid. I've been keeping an eye out for an old mate of mine at UCL who Sky and the BBC always wheel out as their "virus expert" to tell them they are all being tools, but no luck yet.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:32, Reply)
Well they're only talking about the method being redacted not the data.
Which is not quite as bad. However if it can't be properly recreated by someone else then it's not really worth publishing at all.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:34, Reply)
Quite.
But, why should the US in particular have any say? I wouldn't mind so much if it was the UN or something. And the method has the potential to be hugely useful in treating viral diseases in the future, so not publishing it because some US military tool has watched "contagion" once too often is a bit arse.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:35, Reply)
Looking into it a bit closer it's just a recommendation from the body
they have no actual power. The majority of the members are from outside government institutions as well.
(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:47, Reply)
I think it's a load of gay shit.

(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:39, Reply)
So's yer face.

(, Wed 21 Dec 2011, 12:47, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1