![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
So do I, but I reckon I could make my own, if needs be.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 13:01, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:03, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Myself and Mr. Ape are dividing things up here.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:28, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You want to play "The area where you live is not self-supporting"? Oh I shall laugh if you guys ever get independence. I've never understood why anyone on this side of the boarder was against it. Last poll I saw, more English were for it than Scotts, which show's you're not all stupid at least.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:36, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You can't eat money. especially pretend money.
I've no interest in scots independence, i'm not scottish for a start, but the idea that London could be self sufficient is breathtaking in its idiocy, mate. what are you planning to eat and drink?
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:42, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
As any fule kno.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:47, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
rather loike scotch independence.
it's=d be interesting to see how much the money would buy though. I reckon if we kept the bet bits of the south, as suggested by APe, we could make it work and probably be better off.
I think we'd do better to kick Scotland out and most of the north, and such, never seen what we gain from hanging on to the shit bits.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:49, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but mostly what you gain is not having the crushing certainty of the tories in power for the rest of time. you may wish to consider this.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:52, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I suspect the revenue comes form Oil and I suspect we'd keep that.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 15:03, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The oil comes mainly from Scotland. The rest from the English side of the North Sea.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 15:11, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
fuck it, point less arguement. I'm not running this country, or things'd be run betterer.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 15:14, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"Even if all revenue from North Sea oil and gas had come to Scotland, the country would have had a 'persistent deficit'," says Professor Arthur Midwinter, an adviser to the Scottish Executive's finance committee.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 15:16, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
That if Scotland had gained independence first time around in the 1970s it would now be as wealthy as Norway or Switzerland.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 15:19, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
rather like scotch independence.
it'd be interesting to see how much the money would buy though. I reckon if we kept the bet bits of the south, as suggested by APe, we could make it work and probably be better off.
I think we'd do better to kick Scotland out and most of the north, and such, never seen what we gain from hanging on to the shit bits.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:50, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
although it could. but I was thinking much more base then that - London has no power generation and nowhere near enough water.
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:53, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 14:57, Reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Wed 14 Mar 2012, 13:05, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread