Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
but given that Johnson's record is of massive overspends on every project he's been involved in and no new ideas during his term, voting for Ken at least puts someone with ideas in office.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:38, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
*dies fucking laughing*
Ahem, overspends? GLC in the eighties? yeah. Ken's solid fucking economic gold, mate.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:41, Reply)
How London used to be run before it collapesed in massive overspend, very obvious fraud and Livingston and others being incredibly lucky to avoid arrest and prosecution
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:45, Reply)
Both were massively more expensive than claimed, and with the buses, they were a fucking pointless vanity project instead of just improving an existing bus design.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:42, Reply)
The idea that a man who masterminded the epic financial fraud/clusterfuck that was the GLC would be better, however, is the best bit of comedy I've heard in AGES. Thanks ;)
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:44, Reply)
Under Boris fares have actually risen above inflation, under Kens they stayed about the same as inflation.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:47, Reply)
and everything to do with the state of the economy and investment in projects.
I'm not defending Boris. I just think it's funny that anyone can defend Ken on economic or financial management grounds
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:53, Reply)
that while Boris overspends, at least he hasn't been repeatedly and very obviously guilty of massive levels of fraud and cover-ups.
I don't really care about personality. They are both very obviously fucking awful and shouldn't be in charge of a lemonade stall let alone the capital.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:43, Reply)
The Jasper stuff, coupld of overseas deals when he was mayor, plus all the money GLC lost.
(, Wed 2 May 2012, 11:52, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread