b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1616669 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Obviously

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:32, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
now work out how many texts it would be factoring in 8 hours sleep
i keep coming up with fewer texts per hour, and that ain't right
(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)
4.18?

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)
3.1495

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:34, Reply)
Always with the pies

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:39, Reply)
4.16 recurring.

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:35, Reply)
how did you get to that conclusion? very close to mine, what did i miss?

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
oh wait we got the same answer, i misread it

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)
One text every fifteen minutes
isn't that much.
(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:37, Reply)
it is if you think about it
because it won't have been a steady rate, you'd have gone hours without sending one, then you'd send tens or possibly hundreds in one hour,a nd then lull again

2000 is a lot
(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:38, Reply)
if he sent very long texts
they could guzzle up 4 or 5 at a time?

i had a boyfriend who used to send me dreadful texts that would say things like "c u" and "4" and all the text speak i loathe. i was so relieved when i found out he had a shit old phone that simply couldn't cope with multiple messages.
(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:51, Reply)
this is like a really shit episode of countdowns

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:37, Reply)
it's less interesting than that, dude

(, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:50, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1