Obviously

(PsychoChomp, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:32, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

now work out how many texts it would be factoring in 8 hours sleep
i keep coming up with fewer texts per hour, and that ain't right
(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)

4.18?

(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:33, Reply)

3.1495

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:34, Reply)

Always with the pies

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:39, Reply)

4.16 recurring.

(PsychoChomp, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:35, Reply)

how did you get to that conclusion? very close to mine, what did i miss?

(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)

oh wait we got the same answer, i misread it

(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:36, Reply)

One text every fifteen minutes
isn't that much.
( Kroney, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:37, Reply)

it is if you think about it
because it won't have been a steady rate, you'd have gone hours without sending one, then you'd send tens or possibly hundreds in one hour,a nd then lull again

2000 is a lot
(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:38, Reply)

if he sent very long texts
they could guzzle up 4 or 5 at a time?

i had a boyfriend who used to send me dreadful texts that would say things like "c u" and "4" and all the text speak i loathe. i was so relieved when i found out he had a shit old phone that simply couldn't cope with multiple messages.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:51, Reply)

this is like a really shit episode of countdowns

(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:37, Reply)

it's less interesting than that, dude

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 16 May 2012, 11:50, Reply)