
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

My BMI is 26.6. My body fat percenate varies between 12 and 14%. I think I know which one I'd pay attention to.
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:36, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

BMI of 30. Body fat percentage - 5%. Being simultaenously obese and also having a fat level so low that physical health could be adversely affected is rather an achievement, I thought.
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:41, Reply)

BMI really only works if we are in fact two-dimensional. Comparing height to weight ratios is completely idiotic. Proportion of muscle to fat is a far more effective comparison.
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:47, Reply)

if it's early-mid 20's, don't worry, late 20's, get on a diet, 30+ you're a fat fucker
but other than that, don't over-analyse it
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:48, Reply)

No need for over complicating things as you say though. Trouble is most people who look normal on the outside are considered overweight by strict BMI comparison.
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:50, Reply)

which said that its not your fault yourt fat, so its ok
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:51, Reply)

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01k0fs0
it was interesting, basically Nixon's agricultural minister industrialised American farming, this lead to excess corn, that corn instead of going to waste was refined to make corn syrup. Corn syrup was then added to other foods to make them sweeter, corn syrup contains fructose, fructose is a type of energy which is not only very fattening but actually seems to suppress your body's 'I'm full' reflex.
the WHO organisation was going to set fructose & sugar limits in food, but the food industry said 'FUCK YOU', so they've settled on trying to promote low fat foods instead.
So your fat because: America
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:58, Reply)

because it doesn't make any allowance for build and it doesn't consider muscle levels.
Like Luggage says, it's only useful if you are two-dimensional.
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 12:00, Reply)

therefore a basic guideline is no bad thing for them
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 12:06, Reply)

However, the basic outline in this case is still wrong. It was invented by an obscure Belgian mathematician who knew nothing about human biology. Hence why I think it's a crock.
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 12:14, Reply)

if its just some prick with a chart, then yeah its bollocks
if some prick attaches electrodes to your tits and runs a current through you, thats science, mofo
( , Thu 21 Jun 2012, 11:47, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread