
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Copyright doesn't work for products as such, at least in the sense I think you mean. Copyright protects the reproduction of a creative form.
( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:50, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

Also, he stole it from someone else.
( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:52, Reply)

he's always making awesome stuff and not at all tacky stained glass stuff.
( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:54, Reply)

( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:55, Reply)

( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:57, Reply)

one hung on for about 4 days but he had just heaved her into a ditch and left her so it was pretty unpleasant.
( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 12:00, Reply)

Each part of the thing/system I've developed is well-known so, the 'prior art' portion of patent law is immediately deployed. I could get over this bit with £25k to argue it in court and I'm not sure I'd win, not because I think I'm wrong but those that would oppose the patent are multinationals - better lawyers and bottomless pockets.
I'm looking at the same sort of protection that Novax got for their 'Fanned fret' idea - there were loads of 'prior art' arguments but they still managed to get protection which meant they could charge royalties to everyone using the system.
( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 12:19, Reply)

And I'm afraid it doesn't matter who you're up against, it'll cost you tens to hundreds of thousands to produce and defend a patent IF the thing you've protected is actually worth anything. It's thousands just to even submit one.
( , Thu 28 Jun 2012, 13:28, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread