b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1655128 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

why can't you patent it?
Copyright doesn't work for products as such, at least in the sense I think you mean. Copyright protects the reproduction of a creative form.
(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:50, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
Because it's a shit idea and he doesn't want to get laughed at.
Also, he stole it from someone else.
(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:52, Reply)
I bet he stole it from TRL
he's always making awesome stuff and not at all tacky stained glass stuff.
(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:54, Reply)
I heard he was so sexy when he was making stained glass stuff that loads of women threw themselves on his blow torch and died horribly.

(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:55, Reply)
but did they die before or after he arrived at the ex hooker's house?

(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 11:57, Reply)
A couple died straight away
one hung on for about 4 days but he had just heaved her into a ditch and left her so it was pretty unpleasant.
(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 12:00, Reply)
It's the PERFECT glass for throwing a cat through.

(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 12:48, Reply)
Several reasons for not patenting
Each part of the thing/system I've developed is well-known so, the 'prior art' portion of patent law is immediately deployed. I could get over this bit with £25k to argue it in court and I'm not sure I'd win, not because I think I'm wrong but those that would oppose the patent are multinationals - better lawyers and bottomless pockets.
I'm looking at the same sort of protection that Novax got for their 'Fanned fret' idea - there were loads of 'prior art' arguments but they still managed to get protection which meant they could charge royalties to everyone using the system.
(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 12:19, Reply)
That's still a patent not copyright.
And I'm afraid it doesn't matter who you're up against, it'll cost you tens to hundreds of thousands to produce and defend a patent IF the thing you've protected is actually worth anything. It's thousands just to even submit one.
(, Thu 28 Jun 2012, 13:28, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1