
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

so I suspect the answer is 'self criticism' which stands to reason
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:30, 3 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

If so what have I missed?
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:36, Reply)

so I miss all the exciting things I imagine happen in the day. There was some mad shit earlier with Quentin trying to categorise us by how many parents we had, but that just got complicated as he'd not thought it through
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:38, Reply)

It's a non-sequiter. How can you have a skill if you're no good at it?
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:33, Reply)

by the fact that they haven't self criticised
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:34, Reply)

no: the thing can be a skill, but you don't have that skill, or have tried and suck at it
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:35, Reply)

Computers and plumbing.
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:37, Reply)

I won't ask you to fix the waterwheel driven computer then
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:38, Reply)

Waterwheel is mechanical and therefore logical.
It's the pressure bits of plumbing that are a dark art to me.
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:41, Reply)

is always slippage between signifier and signified. Words and meaning are only loosely associated and dependent on many other things.
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 21:04, Reply)

Chicken Saussuare? That is good. I had it cooked on a native's corrugated-iron roof.
That's structuralist
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 21:14, Reply)

but I had to go to the pub.
I had a backup about lacan, too
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 22:46, Reply)

Na, I' m particularly hopeless at DIY (unless that includes, you know). Also hopeless at cooking, conversation, speaking on the phone, sympathy for anybody that reads the Mail and the pathetic fools that pass for sports journalists in Scotland.
( , Mon 2 Jul 2012, 20:36, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread