the thin end of the wedge argument, so verstaile it can be used in almost all situations
also bollocks as one step does not necessarily lead to another
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:04, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

Somebody getting imprisoned
for saying something on his personal status is a violation of his freedom of speech regardless of whether you think he's a prick to say it. He is supposed to have the right to say whatever he wants. Other people don't have the right to silence you until it violates their own rights, which do *not* include the right to sit in a little bubble of approval and to never be offended by anything, ever.
( Kroney, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:07, Reply)

not according to the social media act 2003
LEARN FACTS FUCKO
( mark morrisons prison shoes I love Willie, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:08, Reply)

It's a good job bad laws never get passed

( Kroney, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:14, Reply)

that's a purely objective argument.
fact is, we can't pass any laws that contravene the european act on human rights, this includes free speech.

jog on fucko.
( mark morrisons prison shoes I love Willie, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:20, Reply)

This all began when you started intercepting bog trotter's emails and reading them

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:09, Reply)

He only reads the fit ones' emails
Just in case they say something a bit saucy.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:11, Reply)

lol
ur stopid, we don't have freedom of speech in the uk, it's never been a legal requirement
(quintsy, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:39, Reply)