 Off Topic
 Off TopicAre you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
 Online psychometric and aptitude  testing later.
	Online psychometric and aptitude  testing later.Soup for lunch, dinner with girlfriend later. Rock 'n' roll.
(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 10:38, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
 Agreed!
	Agreed!I walked out of an interview once because the company used a graphologist to determine your pschological profile FFS!
(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 10:44, Reply)
 It helps them to target consumers with their preferred type of pen.
	It helps them to target consumers with their preferred type of pen.(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 10:56, Reply)
 Never even heard of one, but I know capt hates to confirm to corporate will
	Never even heard of one, but I know capt hates to confirm to corporate will(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 11:04, Reply)
 It's not about not 'conforming to corporate will'
	It's not about not 'conforming to corporate will'I very much doubt that anyone's personality or suitability for a job can be ascertained from a sample of their handwriting. They might as well use your star sign or consult a psychic or homeopathist ffs!
Couldn't take them seriously
(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 11:14, Reply)
 Good work.
	Good work.By guaranteeing you wouldn't get a job that you presumably wanted enough to apply for, you definitely stuck it to the man.
(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 11:14, Reply)
 The job was appealing, I grant you
	The job was appealing, I grant youHowever, using graphology as a recruitment tool made me doubt their sanity.
As did their willingness to interview me tbh.
(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 11:16, Reply)
 a small number of companies know how to use them properly
	 a small number of companies know how to use them properlyand they are very effective. But otherwise, I agree, although it;'s not that they are bullshit per se, it's just most companies don't understand how to use them.
(, Wed 24 Oct 2012, 11:13, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

