b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1782865 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Ah but the difference with you is that it's true.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:31, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
He's done that now.
Everyone knows that it wasn't him who did it. Now he wants to keep this story going by sueing literally thousands of people one by one.

Or should I say, he will keep the story going, when he probably doesn't want that to happen.
(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:32, Reply)
I changed my post to be all lol and now yours makes no sense.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:33, Reply)
The suing everyone thing is fucking preposterous and shall be dropped v soon I expect.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:33, Reply)
i think it's excellent, will show these internet twats that they can't just mouth off as and when they like

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:35, Reply)
You're still searching for a lawyer to take on your case for removing all the 'bent spastic' claims from the internet then?

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:45, Reply)
gonna get swipe on board

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:52, Reply)
Preposterous and also impossible in any realistic sense.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:37, Reply)
As proven by Nakers thinking the idea is excellent.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:39, Reply)
it's like the papers splashing Joanna Yate's landlord all over the front page effectively calling him guilty
he rightly sued, rightly won and I see no difference between that and these twitter twats. Leaving the technical difficulties aside.
(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:45, Reply)
That was appalling. Just because he looked weird he was declared a murderer in the national press.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:47, Reply)
this is the same in my book

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:48, Reply)
It depends on whether someone has said
'he is a nonce' or 'his is the name put forward as a nonce', I suppose. The latter is merely stating a fact.
(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:54, Reply)
You'd have been declared several times on this basis.

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 11:06, Reply)
There couldn't possibly be a difference to see!
You're right NA, I hope he does sue every user who mentioned his name.
(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:49, Reply)
facetious internetting, well done

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:52, Reply)
Several hundred thousand profiles were "hacked" that day...

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:39, Reply)
They'd still have to go through them all
in order to find any proof that the account making the statement belonged to a particular person and, hacked or not, I'd be amazed if that didn't contravene privacy laws.
(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:41, Reply)
maybe a he should just run a few test cases, and put the shits up everyone else

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:46, Reply)
Never heard of Barbara Streisand , has he!

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:35, Reply)
Morning, Yoda

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:37, Reply)
lol star wars

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:39, Reply)
should have been a ? not ! ,bloody stupid phone

(, Thu 15 Nov 2012, 10:47, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1