
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

But he CAN fix this thread
CLEGG, a hero for our times
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 11:50, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 11:56, Reply)

( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:01, Reply)

I reckon anyway
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 11:58, Reply)

I hadn't looked into any numbers
I apologise for everything
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:03, Reply)

btw do you play starcraft2? want to have a game?
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:04, Reply)

I have a 100% win streak so far. I've played one game
But sure, do I have you on there?
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:22, Reply)

Gotcha
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:02, Reply)

Nick Clegg was elected, as was Gordon Brown. The people don't elect PMs.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:03, Reply)

they just got one by default due to the result and some power politics by one N.Clegg.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:06, Reply)

We don't vote for which party wins the Parliament. That is not what our votes are for. That is decided by mathematics. The fact that a coalition happened is down to maths.
What I'm saying here is it's nothing to do with us. We vote for our local MPs. That's it. Saying that anyone is unelected or whatever is as inaccurate as it is nonsensical.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:09, Reply)

and the bad mid term council election results for any councillor in the same party as the government are down to their bad personalities?
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:14, Reply)

You vote for them based on their policies. Depending on how many votes they get, somebody wins. We say they've won a "seat". The amount of "seats" across the country are counted. If one party gets the most "seats" (there's one "seat" per physical seat in Parliament, you see) by a particular margin, then they've got a "majority" in Parliament. The head of that party, who's elected by the party members, gets to be PM. That's elected by the party members, not you. He gets to be in Parliament because he also has won a "seat" in his "constituency".
If one party doesn't win enough "seats" to win a "majority", they have to form a "coalition". This is usually done with the party that's come third in the "seat" race.
And that is how it works. If anybody votes for any reason other than the above, such as personalities, they are an idiot. If they vote for a party based on who the leader is, who's probably based in a constituency miles and miles away from them, they're a full-blown fuckwit.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:19, Reply)

that's not true. They're benches.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:21, Reply)

Perhaps I should have said "arse-space".
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:22, Reply)

unfortunately one of the drawbacks of democracy is that fuckwits can vote too.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:25, Reply)

Power to vote would be granted by an examination which would include, but not be limited to, testing you to make sure you actually know what it is you're voting for.
Many, many people wouldn't bother to sit the test.
( , Thu 10 Jan 2013, 12:28, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread