this is the second point, description of goods.
the moral point would be "I ordered a Toshiba annd got a compaq, this is immoral"
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 11 Feb 2013, 12:18, 1 reply, 13 years ago)

Kindda...
It's more like you've ordered a 3.2ghz quad core processor, and they've given you a 2.6ghz duel core, and the operating system is reported as a 3.2ghz.... and you only use 2ghz anyway so don't really notice the difference. BUT, then, one day you run a benchmark on it, and it's reported at a 2.6ghz duel.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 11 Feb 2013, 12:24, Reply)

But you running a 2.6Ghz processor isn't immoral, you've just been ripped off.

(Bazongaloid, Mon 11 Feb 2013, 12:27, Reply)

See my reply lower, I got the wrong end of the stick from your objection to their objection.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 11 Feb 2013, 12:44, Reply)

but that's my point gonz
a horse is not a slower processor, it's just a different brand, it's an intel, not an AMD. there is a legitimate argument about mislabelling the product, that aregument could even be said to be a moral argument.

however "it's immoral to eat horsies" is just bollocks.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 11 Feb 2013, 12:27, Reply)