It does sound like she's in a shitty situation
but it's of her own making. You can't just keep having children you can't afford and expect the council to pick up the slack. Council support should be limited to to one or two children. After that you're on your own.
( Kroney, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:36, 3 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

What if the second one was triplets?

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:37, Reply)

Well that's hardly your fault, is it?
Council support would count. What I'm saying is that council support shouldn't extend to taking away all accountability for an adult's behaviour.
( Kroney, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:39, Reply)

Don't try and be reasonable about this.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:39, Reply)

Soz.
Obviously she should have been chemically neutered. Thankfully cervical cancer has removed that burden to the taxpayer LOL!
( Kroney, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:41, Reply)

I think there's an inherited link with cervical cancer.
So her kids will probably get it as well YAY!
(PsychoChomp, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:44, Reply)

YESSSSSS

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:55, Reply)

The problem with this arguement
is that the kids would suffer, and why should the kids suffer just because their mother is a stupid waste of oxygen who can't keep her legs together.
( Peej, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:41, Reply)

That woman wouldn't have had 11 children if she had to pay for them herself.
She's only done so because she knows she'll get an inexhaustible supply of benefits. If it's announced that two children is the maximum, I reckon third kids would suddenly become very rare.
( Kroney, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:44, Reply)

Or she's done it because shes a fucking moron.
She may very well have had shit loads of kids even if she didn't get a council mansion
( Peej, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:50, Reply)

I think the moment it's on the 6pm news that a family of five kids starved to death, that policy would be recinded pretty quickly

(Bazongaloid, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:51, Reply)

Nah only the yougest 3 would starve.

(PsychoChomp, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:52, Reply)

And that was their own fault for existing.

( Kroney, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:55, Reply)

the problem with this argument
is that the kids are benefitting, and why should the kids benefit just because their mother is a stupid waste of oxygen who can't keep her legs together.

see, that makes just as much sense
(King Zog of Albania lives in Kensington, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:45, Reply)

So it's ok to let kids stave if they have stupid parents?

( Peej, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:49, Reply)

it's ok to shoot stupid people in the head and bury them in mass graves

(King Zog of Albania lives in Kensington, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:51, Reply)

The problem with this argument
is that having to subsist on the meagre amount of money you get from the state isn't really a benefit.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:50, Reply)

The problem with this argument
is that people who don't have jobs really should be living on subsistence money
(King Zog of Albania lives in Kensington, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:52, Reply)

The problem with this argument
is that there aren't any jobs
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:55, Reply)

The problem with this argument
is I don't even remotely give a shit about poor people
(King Zog of Albania lives in Kensington, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:57, Reply)

You are a Tory MP AICMFP

( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 11:03, Reply)

povvos can fucking eat each other for all I care, they sicken me

(King Zog of Albania lives in Kensington, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 11:08, Reply)

'the slack' is right - 'wizard's sleeve' isn't even near, I'll bet.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 10:53, Reply)

It was like waving a toothpick up Market Jew street.

( Peej, Tue 19 Feb 2013, 11:06, Reply)