Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
any different to a picture of a woman in a bikini, which would arguably be allowed? No rude bits are on show.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:22, 1 reply, 13 years ago)
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:26, Reply)
Surely he's a bit more open minded about this kind of thing?
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:27, Reply)
...threw a wobbler after his boss caught him looking at a Beth Ditto image that JMG posted on here. It probably wasn't him, it could have been any one of the regulars who've been posting on here all day and voting it onto the PP.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:28, Reply)
but if someone posted a picture of a woman in a bikini on /OT during work hours, and someone else complained, then I would link it, yes.
Just think about TV watersheds. If they wouldn't put it on BBC during the day, don't post it on /OT.
Then again, I'm just going by what it's been like during the last few years. If it's time to change the format, and the majority wants pictures of naked Chegwins and that, then they're welcome to it, and those of us that don't like it can fuck off to somewhere else.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:29, Reply)
Would Badger's picture have been acceptable if the blokes were wearing thongs?
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:31, Reply)
Maybe I'm the one in the wrong. Maybe that's what /OT should really be about, and I should fuck off to mumsnet.
"Am I being unreasonable to ask people not to post CDCs during office hours?"
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:36, Reply)
Perhaps I should have that Baby's First Banhammer off you.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:38, Reply)
I have a feeling I'm on to a loser with this one, so I'll admit defeat.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:47, Reply)
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:49, Reply)
i actually was joking there, but that candle thing is a far cry from a picture of actual nearly naked men, that i really don't want on my screen at work.
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 22:03, Reply)
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:50, Reply)
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 22:03, Reply)
(, Mon 25 Mar 2013, 21:53, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread