Not really.
You need to deal with this increase in demand with a smaller budget.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 11:48, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

we are mostly funded by donations but i guess with people having less spare cash
those donations will decrease
as we face more and more genuinely distressed people worrying that they will become homeless because, while they can't work and need help getting better and help getting back functioning in society, any sort of safety net is pulled out from beneath them and they fall further from society, all while we tell them they are scroungers and it's all their fault
( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 11:51, Reply)

LOL

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 11:52, Reply)

so you can see why the argument for these reforms seems to me to be particularly unpleasant

( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 11:53, Reply)

i've worded that sentence all wrong and thing

( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 11:54, Reply)

to be fair, they shouldn't have gotten ill without being rich to start with
the dicks
( Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 11:52, Reply)

Maybe if they were good at something that someone would pay for they wouldn't be so unpalitable to the goverment.
Why shouldn't we reward hard workers who have done things like inherited lots of money?
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 2 Apr 2013, 12:49, Reply)