if anyone wants to sift through my unbearably tedious emails and texts about work and angst over the ex
they are perfectly welcome to them.

overall i think it's a bad thing, but if it stops people dying because something dangerous is uncovered in time, then meh, if you've got nothing to hide, why would you mind?
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 11:59, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

Because I have got something to hide.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:01, Reply)

a secret dhal recipe?
or the fact that you're not actually the father of your second child?
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:02, Reply)

We don't get hung up on paternity issues here in the commune
We're all part of one big family
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:03, Reply)

that's the nicest word for Coventry that i've ever heard

( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:05, Reply)

Unfortunately the old "if you havent got something to hide" tosh
is beside the point, it is the invasion of privacy which is the sticking point. Bit like the ID cards thing a few years back. Essentially the whole of the Pro argument was that it would stop terrorism and if you have nothing to hide then why wouldn't you mind. The point of this rambling bollocks, is that it is the bark of all the current powers that doing XYZ will reduced terror. While at the same time the people creating the terror are generally the powers that be.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:11, Reply)

Well them and the makers of the 'Saw' films.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:15, Reply)

DUH OBVS...

(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Mon 10 Jun 2013, 12:16, Reply)