Off TopicAre you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(
rob, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
i agree it's a dumpbut as a resident who lives v near it - 7500 more homes... jesus christ, you already can't move on the streets around there because of fuckwits, trying to drive through earls court adds 25 minutes to any journey. so i'd need to see how the developers propose to deal with the infrastructure and then i could form a view.
(
rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 13:55,
1 reply,
12 years ago)
just because nobody would want to build or live in barnet(
rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 13:58,
Reply)
AKSHERLLY THEY DID WANT TO BUILD IN BARNET AND WE ALL SAID NO AND THEY FUCKED OFF AKSHERLLY!(, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 13:59, Reply)
You could do with rebuilding your Barnet(
sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 14:00,
Reply)
On a serious noteit's not the developers responsibility to put in the rest of the infrastructure, it's up to the city of london/local authority.
And they won't do anything like that until there is a need so you're forever stuck in a chicken and egg situation, particularly when all the infrastructure is privatised.
(, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 14:04, Reply)
how many developers went bust over battersea, 2, 3?it does suck, because on the one hand the new homes are needed, and the site is an eyesore. but on the other, it really is not the place to put them, unless they are prepared to spend a fortune on the roads etc. earls court is a nightmare as it is, tube, roads, the works.
(
rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 14:06,
Reply)
and i do, so i think the developers should be reigned inalso i hate modern architecture. it's looks nasty. bring back the victorian bricks.
(
rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 4 Jul 2013, 14:11,
Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread